In 2025, many QIMS authors make outstanding contributions to our journal. Their articles published with us have received very well feedback in the field and stimulate a lot of discussions and new insights among the peers.

Hereby, we would like to highlight some of our outstanding authors who have been making immense efforts in their research fields, with a brief interview of their unique perspective and insightful view as authors.

Outstanding Authors (2025)

Sahel Heydarheydari, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Sofija Pejkova, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia

Marek Dostál, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic

Isabel Plaza de las Heras, University Hospital Fundación Alcorcón, Spain

Ibrahim Ibrahim, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Czech Republic

Obianuju S. Madueke-Laveaux, University of Chicago Medicine, USA

Anne-Sophie van Schelt, King’s College London, UK

Fernando Ruiz Santiago, Hospital of Neuro-traumatology, Spain

Chadaporn Keatmanee, Ramkhamhaeng University, Thailand

Jaime Isern-Kebschull, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain

Jean-Pierre Laissy, Bichat University Hospital AP-HP, France

Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Spain

May Phu Paing, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand

Yajun Ma, University of California, San Diego, USA

Ahmet Bozer, Izmir City Hospital, Turkey

Austin C. Cooper, McGill University, Canada

Baris Demirkol, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Turkey

Andrey Kirukhin, First Moscow State Medical University, Russia

Lukas Lambert, Motol University Hospital, Czech Republic

Diana Expósito Jimenez, Hospital Universitario Sanitas La Moraleja, Spain

Keisuke Sugahara, Tokyo Dental College, Japan

Marina Valeryevna Cherkasskaya, Moscow Health Care Department, Russia

Olga Yu. Panina, Moscow City Hospital, Russia

Yedaun Lee, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Korea

Sven S. Walter and Haidara Almansour, The University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany

Felix Corr, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Switzerland

Outstanding Author

Sahel Heydarheydari

Dr. Sahel Heydarheydari is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Paramedicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. She is also affiliated with the Cancer Research Center at the same university. She earned her Ph.D. in Medical Physics, specializing in Medical Imaging, from Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Her research primarily focuses on the application of artificial intelligence in medical imaging, particularly in disease prediction, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment response assessment. With several peer-reviewed publications and ongoing research projects, she is committed to integrating AI-driven methodologies with medical diagnostics to enhance diagnostic accuracy, optimize clinical decision-making, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

In Dr. Heydarheydari’s opinion, a successful author in academic research needs a combination of technical expertise, critical thinking, and effective communication skills. A strong understanding of the subject matter is essential for producing high-quality research, while analytical thinking helps in interpreting and presenting data logically. Attention to detail ensures accuracy in research findings, and strong writing skills allow for clear and concise communication of complex ideas. Additionally, time management, perseverance, and adaptability are crucial, as the research and publication process often involves multiple revisions, constructive criticism, and peer reviews. Successful authors also possess the ability to synthesize and analyze information from various sources, ensuring their work is well-rounded and impactful.

To minimize biases in academic writing, Dr. Heydarheydari believes that an author should prioritize objectivity and evidence-based reasoning. This process begins with a well-structured research design, ensuring diverse sample selection, clear methodology, and unbiased data interpretation. Using statistical validation methods, acknowledging potential limitations, and referencing a broad and diverse range of literature help maintain a balanced perspective. Furthermore, using precise and neutral language instead of subjective or emotionally charged statements prevents unintended bias. To her, engaging with different perspectives and being open to constructive criticism also contribute to producing well-rounded, unbiased research.

“My motivation for academic writing comes from my passion for research and my commitment to sharing knowledge with the scientific community. The opportunity to explore emerging technologies, develop innovative solutions, and contribute to medical advancements is incredibly fulfilling. Moreover, scientific writing allows me to collaborate with experts worldwide, exchange insights, and contribute to the global body of knowledge. Through publishing research, I aim to bridge the gap between artificial intelligence and medical imaging, ultimately enhancing diagnostic accuracy and improving patient outcomes. Beyond that, the ability to mentor young researchers and inspire future generations in this field is deeply rewarding. Knowing that my work contributes to the advancement of medical research and healthcare innovations motivates me to stay committed to academic pursuits,” says Dr. Heydarheydari, “Research is not just about discovering new knowledge; it's about sharing insights, inspiring future generations, and shaping the future of medicine through innovation and collaboration.”

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Sofija Pejkova

Dr. Sofija Pejkova, MD, PhD, is a Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon and Associate Professor of Surgery and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at the Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia. Since 2008, she has practiced at the University Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, where she focuses on complex reconstructive procedures, microsurgery, and hand and peripheral nerve surgery. She earned her Doctor of Medical Sciences in 2018 and completed many international fellowships, mainly at the Medical University of Vienna. Her leading research projects explore platelet-rich plasma for nerve regeneration and tarsal tunnel decompression in diabetic neuropathy. Committed to training future surgeons, Dr. Pejkova established North Macedonia’s first microvascular anastomotic course and establishing hands-on dissection course in microsurgical skills, conducted with the participation of esteemed international experts. She is a member of the Macedonian Association of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgeons (MAPRAS), President of the Macedonian Association of Reconstructive Microsurgery (MARM), and a member of ICOPLAST, the American Society of Peripheral Nerve Surgery (ASPN), the Federation of European Societies for Surgery of the Hand (FESSH), and the Global Nerve Foundation. These affiliations facilitate her collaboration with international experts and ensure her continued engagement with the latest advancements and best practices in reconstructive and microsurgery. She is dedicated to clinical innovation, academic leadership, and the education of future surgeons in the fields of reconstructive microsurgery and peripheral nerve surgery. Follow Dr. Pejkova on LinkedIn and Instagram.

QIMS: What are the most commonly encountered difficulties in academic writing?

Dr. Pejkova: Clarity, organization, and precision are fundamental to academic writing. Balancing depth with accessibility and ensuring logical progression and coherence can be challenging. A formal, objective style is essential, requiring critical engagement with sources without resorting to mere summary or plagiarism. Psychological barriers, such as perfectionism and time constraints, can also pose difficulties. However, academic writing is a skill honed through practice, patience, and multiple drafts.

QIMS: Academic writing often involves evidence synthesis. Can you share tips on selecting the appropriate evidence for synthesis and analysis?

Dr. Pejkova: While deciding upon the evidence to synthesize and analyze, primarily, authors should consider relevancy, quality, and diversity of sources. It is essential to include peer-reviewed articles that are both based on solid methodologies, and that offer a range of viewpoints, in addition to the studies which give evidence that is directly related to the research question. Keeping objectivity is a priority for the authors who should also acknowledge their sources and make the synthesis consistent with the research aims. This will lead to a balanced and credible analysis, ultimately strengthening the overall impact of the research.

QIMS: Is it important for authors to disclose Conflict of Interest (COI)? To what extent would a COI influence a research?

Dr. Pejkov: Respecting the principles of transparency and credibility in research is of utmost importance. A COI is capable of seriously affecting research by introducing bias in study design, data interpretation, and conclusions and thus, possibly undermining the scientific integrity. Complete transparency gives readers and reviewers the possibility to measure the relevant COI and therefore, to maintain an objective evaluation of the study.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Marek Dostál

Dr. Marek Dostál serves as the Vice-Chair for Science and Research at the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and holds the position of Head of the Radiological Physics Department at University Hospital Brno (Czech Republic). He graduated from Charles University in Prague with a Bachelor's degree in General Physics and subsequently earned a Master's degree in Biophysics. He completed his postgraduate studies at the Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University in Brno, specializing in Medical Biophysics. His research focuses on the acquisition and analysis of MRI and hybrid PET/MR data, predominantly in the neurological and oncological domains, with a significant portion of his scientific career dedicated to multimodal imaging of the central nervous system. He contributes to nationally certified courses for medical and non-medical professionals and lectures at both the Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, and the Technical University in Brno. Follow Dr. Dostál on ResearchGate.

QIMS: What are the essential elements of a good academic paper?

Dr. Dostál: A good academic paper is a highly subjective concept. An article narrowly specialized in DNA sequencing methodology might be considered good by a reader with long-standing expertise in the topic, but a novice student would likely not share that assessment. Therefore, the primary step is to clearly define the key takeaway message for the readers. Based on this, an appropriate journal should be selected to ensure the main message resonates with the journal's readership and is generally considered a valuable contribution.

Once these two points are established, the entire article must be tailored accordingly. For instance, the introductory section of a highly technical radiological topic with significant clinical impact in wrist imaging would be prepared differently for an orthopedic journal versus a radiological journal. In the radiological journal, a greater understanding of the subject matter can be assumed, allowing for simplification of commonly known radiological issues, which might not be familiar to orthopedists. Similarly, the entire article, including relevant references and, particularly, the discussion, must be adjusted to ensure the readers of the chosen journal truly gain the intended information. Of course, a significant portion of article preparation is also managerial, as most works today are multidisciplinary, involving theorists, clinicians, and statisticians. The principal authors are tasked with maintaining a cohesive text that fulfills the primary objective.

QIMS: Why do you choose to publish in QIMS?

Dr. Dostál: Quantification in MRI is a significant weakness of this otherwise remarkable modality, as numerous factors complicate the situation. Therefore, the pursuit of methods that can substantially mitigate this disadvantage and enable the use of quantitative MRI in clinical practice is highly attractive. QIMS is a logical choice, as its name suggests. After reviewing the aims and scope, citation potential, editorial board composition, and the current issue, it is evident that this journal is not only a logical but also an excellent choice for publishing quantitative studies using imaging methods in medicine, especially if I aim to maximize the impact of my work on other researchers, which is indicative of the journal's citation potential. This is why I have published several studies in QIMS.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Isabel Plaza de las Heras

Isabel Plaza de las Heras, MD, earned her medical degree from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain. After that, she specialized in Family Physician, focusing on infectious and contagious diseases. She completed a postgraduate degree in Epidemiology and Public Health at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Spain. From 2013 to 2018, she undertook a second residency in Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging at Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain. From 2019 to 2024, she worked in the Nuclear Medicine Unit at HM Hospitales. Her work focused on pediatric oncology and neuro-oncology, collaborating with the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit and the AC HM CINAC Comprehensive Neuroscience Center.  She has been a sub-investigator in several clinical trials, including a phase Ib study evaluating the safety and activity of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, phase III trials on radioligand therapies for metastatic neuroblastoma, 177Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and a phase 2b trial involving participants with Parkinson’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Currently, she serves at the University Hospital Fundación Alcorcón, Spain. Combining her work as a nuclear medicine doctor with teaching, she works as the Professor of Radiology in the degree of medicine at the CEU-San Pablo University. She is also an active member of the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SEMNIM), European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), and Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). Connect with Dr. Plaza de las Heras on LinkedIn.

A good academic paper, in Dr. Plaza de las Heras’ view, has several essential elements that ensure clarity, coherence, and academic rigor. These include a title that is clear and precise, an abstract with a brief summary of the study, introduction that presents the topic, problem, and objective, literature review that analyzes previous research, methodology that explains how the study was conducted, results that display findings without interpretation, discussion that analyzes the results and their impact, and conclusion that summarizes the findings and their relevance and references.

In addition, Dr. Plaza de las Heras highlights the importance for authors to follow reporting guidelines such as STROBE (for observational studies), PRISMA (for systematic reviews), and CARE (for case reports) during manuscript preparation. She believes that these guidelines ensure completeness, transparency, reproducibility, clarity, and rigor in research. They also facilitate peer review, enhance ethical practices, and improve publication chances, ultimately strengthening the study’s impact and credibility.

Lastly, Dr. Plaza de las Heras has a few words for all her peers, “Research is the foundation of our knowledge; it drives change and innovation in science. Every study you conduct, every manuscript you write, and every idea you share contribute to a better understanding of the world. The way of research can sometimes be difficult due to obstacles, lack of time, and limited funding, but the curiosity sparked by the unknown and the satisfaction of finding answers serve as inspiration for our generation. Every effort matters the scientific community, and the world, will always be grateful for your dedication in the pursuit of answers.”

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Ibrahim Ibrahim

Ibrahim Ibrahim currently serves at the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), MR Unit, Prague, Czech Republic. He graduated from the Faculty of Medicine at Charles University in Prague with a Master's degree (MSc) in Medical Technology and Informatics and completed his doctoral studies (Ph.D.) in Medical Biophysics. As a clinical researcher, he is interested in all aspects of neurology, with a primary focus on peripheral nerve disorders, particularly brachial and lumbosacral plexopathies, and their imaging using advanced MRI techniques, including MR tractography (MRT) and MR neurography. Learn more about Dr. Ibrahim on ResearchGate and his homepage.

Dr. Ibrahim points out that being a researcher involves both detective work and storytelling. It requires curiosity to explore complex topics, precision in analyzing facts, and creativity in transforming raw data into compelling narratives. In his view, organization is key—maintaining well-structured notes, citations, and sources ensures credibility and effectiveness. Writing should be engaging, clear, and adaptable to different audiences. Strong research skills are essential for uncovering reliable sources, fact-checking information, and connecting ideas in meaningful ways.

To avoid bias in writing, Dr. Ibrahim believes that researchers must first recognize their own assumptions. Presenting multiple points of view, citing a variety of relevant sources, and verifying facts are also essential. Additionally, they should avoid stereotypes and one-sided arguments. Finally, reviewing their work and seeking feedback can help ensure fairness and objectivity.

“Academic writing is a challenging discipline, but it is also a passion that shapes thinking and pushes the boundaries of human knowledge. Writing and publishing research are often necessary steps for obtaining grants, promotions, or prestige in an academic setting. However, for me, it represents curiosity, a desire for knowledge, the discovery of new contexts, and the sharing of information. Additionally, a strong sense of responsibility and the opportunity to make a positive impact serve as powerful motivations,” says Dr. Ibrahim.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Obianuju S. Madueke-Laveaux

Obianuju S. Madueke-Laveaux is an Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Chicago Medicine. She joined the University of Chicago after completing her fellowship training in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery at Columbia University / New York Presbyterian Hospital. She is the Founding Director of the Center for Advanced Treatment and Research (CATeR) of Uterine fibroids. She is a leader in minimally invasive surgical techniques and an experienced gynecologic robotic surgeon with extensive experience in treating complex and challenging cases of endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and pelvic masses. Dr. Madueke-Laveaux is a funded and well published clinical researcher. Her research focus is on the development of precision and preventive medicine for uterine fibroids. Her global health work is focused on community education and awareness of uterine fibroids in sub–Saharan Africa. Follow her on Instagram and X.

In Dr. Madueke-Laveaux’s view, an academic writer should be objective and recognize one’s own biases. Specifically, one should discuss results clearly and use neutral language, provide sources for all contextual discussions and present balanced views, and honestly and accurately assess and discuss results in the context of other published data.

“As a clinician-scientist, I am driven to produce high-quality academic writing because I am deeply committed to advancing our understanding of the complex pathologies I encounter in my clinical practice. By elucidating the underlying mechanisms and risk factors associated with these conditions, I aim to inform the development of precision-based treatments and preventive strategies that can improve patient outcomes and quality of life,” says Dr. Madueke-Laveaux.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Anne-Sophie van Schelt

Dr. Anne-Sophie van Schelt is a postdoctoral researcher at King’s College London, specializing in MR elastography. She earned her PhD at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC. Her work focuses on advancing MR elastography applications in oncology, particularly in assessing chemotherapy efficacy. She investigated its use in the pancreas for predicting responses in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treatment. Currently, her research extends to breast cancer, aiming to enhance chemotherapy efficacy prediction, as well as head and neck cancer applications. Connect with her on LinkedIn.

As a researcher and academic writer, Dr. van Schelt believes that critical writing requires a deep understanding of the existing literature and the ability to evaluate and synthesize information rather than simply describing it. This means questioning assumptions, considering alternative perspectives, and identifying gaps or inconsistencies in current research. In her opinion, a strong academic paper should go beyond summarizing facts—it should engage with the material analytically, weighing the strength of evidence and forming well-supported arguments. Lastly, she emphasizes that self-reflection is crucial—constantly asking, “Have I challenged my own biases?” ensures a truly critical approach.

Dr. van Schelt stresses that transparency in research is essential, and disclosing conflicts of interest (COIs) is a key part of maintaining credibility. COIs, whether financial, institutional, or personal, can consciously or unconsciously influence research design, interpretation, and publication bias. While a COI does not automatically imply misconduct, failing to disclose it can undermine trust in the research. Readers should be able to assess findings with full knowledge of any potential influences. The extent of a COI’s impact varies, but clear disclosure ensures that scientific integrity is upheld, allowing the community to evaluate research in an unbiased way.

“My motivation to write comes from the potential impact of research. Knowing that my work in MR elastography could contribute to vaster knowledge of underlying mechanisms of the cancer microenvironment in a non-invasive way and possibly more effective cancer treatments is a driving force. Academic writing is a way to share discoveries, challenge existing knowledge, and inspire further research. It’s also deeply rewarding to see ideas take shape—transforming raw data into meaningful conclusions. Most academic writing is not a one-person job and therefore collaboration with colleagues is key. Coincidentally it keeps the process supportive and engaging by constantly challenging each other in critical thinking,” says Dr. van Schelt.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Fernando Ruiz Santiago

Fernando Ruiz Santiago is currently the Chairman of Musculoskeletal Radiology in the Hospital of Neuro-traumatology (Granada/Spain). He is also the Head Professor of the Radiology Department at the University of Granada and member of the Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada. His clinical activities include diagnostic and interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system and spine. His research interests focus on the diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal tumors, osteoporosis and vertebral fractures, and ultrasound and CT-guided interventional procedures. He is also an active member of the Spanish Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (SERME), European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) and International Society of Skeletal Radiology (ISS). Follow Dr. Ruiz Santiago on X.

The way Dr. Ruiz Santiago sees it, an author should have a solid background in science and continuous curiosity for learning and research, including gathering and analyzing previous literature as well as identifying ways to contribute new knowledge. Experience in the field of study is also essential, as it provides valuable context and insight and “practice makes perfect”. Besides, he highlights the importance of good writing skills, i.e., knowing how to structure a logical, coherent narrative that effectively communicates ideas in a scientific manner. Furthermore, to avoid biases in writing scientific communications, he believes one should know the previous literature to prevent repetitions and this also makes one confident of adding something novel to the state of the art.

“From the start of my clinical career, I have been drawn to research, even though I had to learn everything from scratch. I dedicated many hours at home reading and writing, and I will always be grateful for the continuous support of my family. At the same time, my daily practice of diagnosing and treating patients with musculoskeletal disorders provides me with invaluable experience. Both experience and reading are complementary tools. While research is not always fully recognized by institutions, I'm glad about what I have done in this field. Ultimately, my work has helped me refine my diagnostic accuracy and improve patient care, which makes all the effort worthwhile,” says Dr. Ruiz Santiago.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Chadaporn Keatmanee

Chadaporn Keatmanee is an accomplished academic with a strong background in telecommunications, computer science, and information science. She earned her B.S.I.ED. in Telecommunication Engineering from King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, followed by an M.Eng. in Computer Science from the Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand. She holds dual Ph.D. degrees: one in Information Science from the Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology and another in Engineering and Technology from Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Thailand. Currently as a lecturer in the Department of Computer Science at Ramkhamhaeng University, her research focuses on healthcare applications, particularly in medical image processing, machine learning, and data privacy. Through her expertise, she aims to drive advancements in the medical industry, leveraging technology to enhance healthcare solutions.

Academic writing is crucial in science, according to Dr. Keatmanee, for documenting, reviewing, and sharing research. It ensures clarity, accuracy, and knowledge exchange, driving advancements in fields like healthcare and technology. Through structured writing, researchers contribute to scientific progress and real-world applications.

To ensure critical writing, Dr. Keatmanee believes academic writers should analyze information deeply, evaluate different perspectives, and support arguments with evidence; question assumptions, identify biases, and provide logical reasoning; and maintain clarity, coherence, and a well-structured argument to demonstrate critical thinking.

In addition, Dr. Keatmanee emphasizes that application for institutional review board (IRB) approval is essential to ensure ethical research, protecting participants' rights, privacy, and well-being. It upholds ethical standards, legal compliance, and research integrity. Without IRB approval, studies risk ethical violations, rejection from journals, legal consequences, and potential harm to participants.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Jaime Isern-Kebschull

Jaime Isern-Kebschull, MD, PhD, is a musculoskeletal radiologist at Hospital Clínic in Barcelona (Spain), specializing in sports imaging and orthopaedic complications. He obtained his medical degree from the Universidad Central of Venezuela, where he began his career as a student researcher, studying tuberculosis in Warao indigenous children—a humanitarian initiative he continues to support today. He completed his radiology specialization in Barcelona and later obtained his PhD from the University of Barcelona, focusing on biomarkers for complications in hip prostheses, with a particular impact on septic complications. For nearly nine years, he has been collaborating with Futbol Club Barcelona in a leading research position on sports muscle injuries, MRI-based reinjury prediction, and pioneering both a classification for MRI monitoring of the healing process and the development of dynamic MRI for muscle assessment. In addition to research, he is actively involved in resident education, serving as the coordinator of musculoskeletal radiology training for residents in Catalonia and the Balearic Islands. He also holds leadership roles in SERME, ESR, ESSR, ISS, RSNA, and SSR, fostering the next generation of radiologists. Connect with him on LinkedIn.

QIMS: Why do we need academic writing?

Dr. Isern-Kebschull: Academic writing is an act of generosity—it is how we give back the knowledge we have gained, refining and shaping it for the future. Through research, we do not just document what we know; we perfect it, challenge it, and make it available for others to build upon. Science and medicine evolve because each generation shares its discoveries and insights, allowing new researchers and clinicians to improve, adapt, and innovate. Academic publishing ensures that ideas are not lost, that progress is cumulative, and that the medical field continues to advance in a structured and meaningful way. Without scientific publication, knowledge would remain fragmented and isolated, limiting its impact. Instead, research provides a legacy—one that can shape new minds, influence clinical decision-making, and improve patient care worldwide.

QIMS: What are the qualities an author should possess?

Dr. Isern-Kebschull: Successful academic authors need to cultivate a mix of precision, perseverance, and teamwork. Conducting research with accuracy and ensuring that findings are well-supported by evidence. Communicating complex medical concepts in a way that is structured, concise, and understandable. Handling the challenges of peer review, revisions, and rejection of papers from journals with determination, and science is not a solo endeavor. A strong research team is essential to moving forward. I have been fortunate to work with exceptional mentors and colleagues who have guided and supported me throughout my academic career. Without a strong team and the right mentors, navigating academic writing would be significantly more challenging. But beyond skills and teamwork, great research starts with a great idea. Creativity in science requires space to think. Some of the best ideas do not arise while sitting at a desk—they emerge in gaps between work, and during quiet moments when the mind has time to process, connect concepts, and see opportunities. Having a flexible work environment that allows these ideas to incubate is essential.

QIMS: The burden of being a scientist/doctor is heavy. How do you allocate time to write papers?

Dr. Isern-Kebschull: Balancing clinical work, research, and academic writing is a challenge, but it becomes manageable with discipline, organization, and a supportive team. In the end, writing papers is an enjoyable task. Not all projects have the same impact. I focus on those with the most clinical relevance and potential scientific contribution. A great team allows work to be distributed efficiently. Moreover, even with a busy schedule, I set aside specific time slots for research and writing. Academic writing is a skill that improves over time. However, one of the biggest challenges today is securing both funding and protected research time. Conducting high-quality research requires personal and professional sacrifice, making every published study a true achievement. Looking ahead, we must embrace the new AI-powered tools that are emerging, as they will streamline many aspects of research and writing, making the process more efficient. However, human expertise, critical thinking, and collaboration will always be irreplaceable in scientific publishing.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Jean-Pierre Laissy

Jean-Pierre Laissy, MD, PhD, is a Professor of Radiology and the former Chair at Paris VII University. He is a researcher with the LVTS UMRS 1148, Team 4, which specializes in nanotechnologies for vascular medicine and imaging. His research focuses on cardiovascular imaging and function, as well as cardiac and vascular inflammation and infection. Currently, he is working on projects related to the vascular complications of endocarditis.

In Dr. Laissy’s opinion, a good academic paper should be original, clear, have high scientific value, and be easily applicable to make a significant contribution to knowledge. The authors of it should possess the qualities of clarity and conciseness, honesty, and transparency. Also, they should be able to provide sound research questions, with objectives clearly defined and awareness of limitations.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini

Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini, MD, PhD, is a specialist in Radiology at the Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, an associate professor at the Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, and the head of the research group "Advanced Medical Imaging" at the Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada. He is also the CEO of the R&D spin-off company 3D Translation SL. His main research interests cover a variety of topics related to radiology and medical imaging, with a particular focus on evidence-based radiology and imaging advances applied to the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In recent years, his research group, which encompasses radiologists and engineers, has been increasingly expanding its focus on artificial intelligence and radiomics applied to medical imaging. Currently, they are working on developing deep learning models and large language models applied to perfusion MRI for addressing clinical outcomes in different conditions, including cancer and vertebral fractures.

In Dr. Ramos-Bossini’s opinion, two main key points can be applied to a high-quality paper. The first one is methodological rigor, which includes reliable study design, data analyses, and well-supported conclusions. This aspect is intrinsic to the paper and should always be ensured, avoiding potential biases, conflicts of interest, etc. The second key aspect is related to the impact of the paper on the research field, which is an external consideration that may be contingent upon a variety of factors that are not always reliable or fair. For instance, authors are all aware of papers that initially attracted little attention but later proved to be groundbreaking. It is evident that the latter aspect is subordinate to the former; however, with a solid methodological approach, the impact—especially in clinical terms—significantly influences what he deems to be top-tier papers.

Dr. Ramos-Bossini thinks two fundamental aspects must be considered to avoid biases when writing a paper, providing a good methodological design of the study. The first one is a thorough understanding of the topic being approached. This implies knowledge of the state of the art regarding the clinical problem addressed, with particular attention to (potential) prior publication bias and its implications, as well as contrasting published findings with real-world clinical practice. The second point is to make a conscious effort to seek and reduce potential biases, including cognitive ones. When one believes that a hypothesis is correct, data analyses and writing can be easily biased toward the direction of one’s preconceptions. To avoid this, his recommendation is to try to be as aseptic as possible throughout all stages of designing a study (and writing a manuscript). If possible, statistical analyses should be performed by an independent, blinded researcher. Finally, consultation with other peers is also recommended.

“Nowadays, academic writers have powerful tools that offer unprecedented ways to enhance science. However, a healthy skepticism and continuous education are more necessary than ever due to the increasing complexity of methodologies, technologies, and AI-based analytical tools. The world of publication in scientific journals is also experiencing profound changes, and maintaining high-quality standards is not an option but a necessity for contributing to progress in science. I would like to encourage academic writers —particularly young clinicians and radiologists— to embrace the existing opportunities by promoting good academic practices, enhancing stronger connections between clinical and theoretical research, and exploiting the promising advantages of AI. Above all, stay committed to producing high-quality work, because continuous progress in science depends on you,” says Dr. Ramos-Bossini.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

May Phu Paing

Dr. May Phu Paing received a D.Eng. degree in Electrical Engineering from King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand, in 2020. Since 2021, she has served as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. Her research interests include image processing, data science, and artificial intelligence, with a particular focus on biomedical applications.

Dr. Paing believes a good academic paper should have a clear objective that addresses current research problems and makes a meaningful contribution to its field. The experimental results must be well-presented and thoroughly validated. Additionally, the writing should be well-structured and concise.

Dr. Paing stays current with the rapidly evolving research trends by reading and referencing cutting-edge papers from reputable sources. Additionally, she believes that attending and participating in conferences is an effective way to stay informed about ongoing research challenges and emerging solutions. Engaging with research communities on social media also helps her keep track of the latest findings. By integrating these insights into her research and analysis, she contributes fresh perspectives to the field.

“One interesting experience I had during academic writing was when one of my manuscripts underwent major revision four times. But instead of being discouraged, I saw it as an opportunity to refine my work. Each round of feedback helped me strengthen my arguments, improve clarity, and enhance the scientific rigor of my research. By meticulously addressing reviewers' comments and updating my manuscript, I not only improved its quality but also deepened my understanding of the subject. This experience reinforced my belief that persistence and adaptability are key to producing impactful research,” says Dr. Paing.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Yajun Ma

Yajun Ma is an Associate Professor of Radiology at UC San Diego, specializing in developing and translating advanced MRI techniques, particularly ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI. UTE sequences enable direct imaging of short T2 species in the nerve, body, and musculoskeletal system, including myelin lipid, lung parenchyma, iron overload, bone, and soft tissue calcification—structures typically invisible with conventional MRI. He has pioneered UTE and short TE (STE) methods to assess short T2 myelin lipid and myelin water changes in the brain, applying them to study myelin loss in MS and TBI. He has also developed advanced morphological and quantitative imaging techniques to improve short T2 contrast and enhance the assessment of biochemical changes in bone, osteochondral junctions, cartilaginous endplates, menisci, tendons, and ligaments. These methods have been utilized to assess tissue health in the knee, hip, shoulder, and spine, aiding in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain.

Dr. Ma believes a good academic paper includes key components like a clear title, an abstract summarizing the research, and a strong introduction outlining the research problem and significance. The methods section details the theory, research design, data collection, and processing as well as statistical analysis, while the results are presented logically, typically supported by tables and figures. The discussion interprets the findings, connects them to previous research, acknowledges limitations, and concludes with a summary of key insights and properly cited references.

In Dr. Ma’s view, authors should focus on clarity, organization, originality, and accuracy while following the journal’s formatting guidelines. Incorporating peer feedback, proofreading thoroughly, and considering the target audience are essential for creating a high-quality, impactful paper.

“Scientific writing is challenging but rewarding, driving progress and expanding human understanding. Stay committed, trust your research, and remember that every contribution, big or small, shapes the future of science,” says Dr. Ma.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Ahmet Bozer

Dr. Ahmet Bozer graduated from Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine (2009–2016), and completed his radiology residency at Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences (2017–2021). After obtaining board certification in radiology in 2021, he continued working at the same institution until 2024, gaining experience in head and neck, abdominal, breast, and interventional radiology. Currently, he serves as a radiology specialist at Izmir City Hospital, under the Ministry of Health, Turkey, the largest healthcare facility in the region. His primary focus is head and neck radiology and neuroradiology. His previous research has focused on breast imaging and MRI-based biomarkers in oncology. He has published in international peer-reviewed journals and actively contributes as a peer reviewer. Additionally, he is involved in resident training, aiming to enhance radiology education through innovative approaches. As a member of multiple radiology societies, he remains committed to continuous learning and professional development in his field.

From Dr. Bozer’s perspective, a good academic paper demonstrates originality and reflects the effort invested in its development. He thinks the most important aspect is presenting new findings that add to existing knowledge rather than repeating what has already been published. A paper does not necessarily have to focus on a widely popular topic, but it should address clinically relevant issues and provide meaningful insights. Clarity, coherence, and a well-structured argument are essential for engaging the reader. Additionally, the study should be methodologically sound, with well-justified research questions and a robust analytical approach. The results should be presented transparently, leading to well-founded and thought-provoking conclusions. A strong academic paper not only contributes to scientific progress but also inspires further research and clinical applications.

To avoid biases in academic writing, Dr. Bozer believes authors should adopt an objective, evidence-based approach. Using clear, neutral language and avoiding emotionally charged or subjective statements is essential. A well-structured methodology with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria helps minimize selection bias. Authors should acknowledge potential limitations and ensure transparency in data interpretation. Citing diverse and high-quality sources prevents confirmation bias, while peer review and collaboration provide external perspectives that help identify unintended biases. Additionally, statistical analyses should be performed rigorously, avoiding selective reporting of results. Using double-blind review processes, where applicable, further enhances objectivity. Ethical considerations, such as disclosing conflicts of interest and funding sources, also contribute to reducing bias. Ultimately, maintaining intellectual honesty and a commitment to scientific integrity is key to producing unbiased, credible research.

“Academic writing requires dedication, and balancing it with the demands of daily life and routine clinical work can be challenging. However, every contribution, no matter how small, plays a role in advancing scientific knowledge. Persistence is key—setbacks, rejections, and revisions are all part of the process. I once had a manuscript rejected by six journals before it was finally accepted by the seventh. Rather than feeling discouraged, view these challenges as opportunities to refine your work and improve your skills. The slow progress of the process can be an opportunity to enhance the quality of your manuscript. Stay curious, keep questioning, and embrace constructive criticism. Collaborating with colleagues and mentors provides valuable insights. Most importantly, maintain passion, as your efforts can influence future discoveries and clinical practice. Scientific progress relies on dedication, and every well-conducted study brings us closer to a deeper understanding of the world,” says Dr. Bozer.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Austin C. Cooper

Dr. Austin Cooper is a PhD candidate in Integrated Neuroscience at McGill University, where he works under the supervision of Dr. Janine Mendola and Dr. Amir Shmuel. His research focuses on understanding functional connectivity within the brain using fMRI and MEG techniques, specifically exploring the neural mechanisms underlying visual perception and consciousness. In his recent work, he has investigated ophthalmological patient groups, compared their brain connectivity with healthy controls, and studied neural oscillations in the context of monocular rivalry. Additionally, he is passionate about the field of neurophenomenology, exploring the neural correlates of meditation and nondual experience. His projects are centered on bridging computational neuroscience with phenomenological insights to provide a comprehensive understanding of human consciousness.

Dr. Cooper thinks a good academic paper sparks curiosity and opens new avenues for exciting, future research. It should build on past work, offering novel insights that enhance our understanding of the topic. A strong paper not only presents findings but also provides a clear framework for others to follow, especially when it introduces a new method or protocol that can be readily adopted by other researchers. Importantly, a good paper contextualizes the significance of its findings in a way that leaves the reader with a clear, impactful takeaway. It effectively balances rigor and humility, being methodologically sound while modest in its claims, and it supports its approach with strong reasoning.

Dr. Cooper thinks that maintaining a focused niche is key to staying current in academic writing. By centering his research on a specific area of expertise in a rapidly evolving field, he can keep track of the most groundbreaking work without being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of new studies. This focus allows him to consistently build on a solid foundation, ensuring that his writing is both up-to-date and provides fresh insights within his specialized field. “It’s about finding balance—staying deeply immersed in my specialty while also being aware of broader developments in the field,” adds he.

“One of the most interesting experiences during my academic writing journey came when I worked on my first three papers, which were systematic reviews. These papers required me to sift through thousands of articles, judging their relevance to the scope of the review. It was an incredibly overwhelming process—one that felt like informational drowning. The sheer magnitude of publications out there, along with the varying quality of research, was eye-opening. I quickly realized the value that a field-wide standardization protocol would have. Yet, despite the challenges, completing these reviews brought a profound sense of relief, knowing that I had navigated the daunting task and emerged with something meaningful to contribute to the field,” says Dr. Cooper.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Baris Demirkol

Dr. Baris Demirkol is an Associate Professor of Pulmonary Medicine at Health Sciences University, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital. He specializes in thoracic oncology, interstitial lung diseases, and advanced bronchoscopic techniques. He obtained his medical degree from Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, and completed his pulmonology residency at Health Sciences University, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital. He further enhanced his expertise with research experience at the University of Chicago. His recent work focuses on bronchoscopy, robotic-assisted procedures, and the role of elastography in mediastinal and hilar lymph node diagnostics. He has authored multiple peer-reviewed articles and book chapters in pulmonology and interventional bronchoscopy. He actively contributes to national and international respiratory societies and has presented his research at numerous congresses. His ongoing projects explore innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in lung diseases, particularly in oncology and fibrosis-related conditions.

Dr. Demirkol thinks academic writing is essential for the dissemination of knowledge, ensuring clarity, precision, and credibility in scholarly communication. It provides a structured and objective approach to presenting research, enabling critical analysis and intellectual discourse. Through proper citation and evidence-based arguments, academic writing upholds integrity and prevents misinformation. Additionally, it fosters the development of analytical and problem-solving skills, contributing to the advancement of science and education. Ultimately, academic writing serves as a foundation for scholarly dialogue, facilitating the exchange of ideas across disciplines.

To ensure that one's writing is critical, Dr. Demirkol believes it is essential to engage in thorough analysis, questioning assumptions, and evaluating evidence from multiple perspectives. A critical approach involves synthesizing information rather than merely summarizing it, identifying gaps in existing knowledge, and constructing well-reasoned arguments supported by credible sources. Using precise language, logical reasoning, and structured argumentation helps to maintain clarity and depth. Additionally, integrating counterarguments and critically assessing their validity strengthen the overall analysis. Ultimately, critical writing requires a balance between objectivity, reflection, and rigorous evaluation of ideas.

“Our manuscript, published in QIMS, initially presented a strong concordance between the two methods used in the study, despite our uncertainty regarding their compatibility. Given these promising results, we anticipated a smooth publication process; however, the manuscript was unfortunately rejected by several journals. Following the review process in QIMS, a reviewer suggested evaluating the concordance among the subtypes, an aspect we had not previously considered. Upon reanalyzing the data, we were surprised to find that the consistency persisted even at the subtype level. This insight significantly contributed to the manuscript’s acceptance and underscored the importance of meticulous peer review. The experience highlighted that constructive criticism plays a vital role in strengthening research quality, encouraging a more comprehensive analysis, and ultimately enhancing the scientific contribution of a study,” says Dr. Demirkol.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Andrey Kiryukhin

Andrey Kirukhin, MD, PhD, works at several academic and clinical institutions, including the First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov, where he is involved in both practical and educational activities related to modern medical procedures. His research focuses on innovative endoscopic techniques such as video capsule endoscopy, endosonography, and fecal microbiota transplantation. He also investigates rare diseases and develops new treatment methods in gastroenterology and endoscopic surgery. Over the years, he has published several papers on rare clinical cases, which have been featured in medical journals in Russia, Germany, the USA, and South Korea. Recently, he has been focusing on new therapeutic approaches in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders and the advancement of minimally invasive surgical methods to improve patient care. Learn more about him here.

QIMS: What are the essential elements of a good academic paper?

Dr. Kirukhin: A good academic paper is structured and meaningful, contributing to a field’s knowledge. For medical journals, key elements include:

• Title and Abstract: The title should clearly summarize the research, while the abstract provides a concise snapshot of the study’s question, methods, results, and conclusions.
• Introduction: Introduce the research problem, its significance, and the research question or hypothesis, including a review of relevant literature.
• Methods: Detailed and transparent explanation of the study’s design, data collection, and analysis methods, ensuring reproducibility.
• Results: Clear, objective presentation of findings, using tables and graphs to display data without interpretation.
• Discussion: Interpret results, compare them with existing research, address study limitations, and suggest future research directions.
• Conclusion: Summarize the findings, emphasizing their significance and potential recommendations.
• References: Properly formatted citations that support the research and place it within the field’s context.
• Ethical Considerations: Ensure adherence to ethical standards, including informed consent, confidentiality, and research integrity.
• Clarity and Writing Style: Clear, concise, and logically organized writing.
• Contribution: The paper should contribute new knowledge, theory validation, or innovative methodologies to the field.

A good paper combines rigorous methodology with ethical integrity to advance scientific understanding.

QIMS: What authors have to bear in mind during preparation of a paper?

Dr. Kirukhin: When preparing a scientific paper for publication, authors must consider several crucial factors to ensure quality and relevance:

• Clear Research Objective and Hypothesis: Define a focused research question or hypothesis that addresses a gap in knowledge or a clinical issue.
• Relevance to the Journal’s Scope: Ensure the research aligns with the journal’s focus to reach the appropriate audience.
• Adherence to Journal Guidelines: Follow submission guidelines for formatting, citation style, and technical requirements to avoid delays or rejection.
• Thorough Literature Review: Conduct a comprehensive review of existing research to justify the need for the study and position it within the current knowledge.
• Rigorous Methodology: Provide a transparent, detailed description of the study’s design and analysis methods for reproducibility.
• Clear and Concise Writing: Use simple, direct language to communicate complex data clearly and effectively.
• Data Presentation: Ensure tables, figures, and graphs are accurate and easy to interpret, supporting the paper's conclusions.
• Ethical Considerations: Adhere to ethical guidelines, including informed consent and disclosure of conflicts of interest.
• Critical Discussion: Analyze results in the context of existing research and propose future research directions.
• Revisions and Peer Review: Be open to constructive feedback and revise the paper for clarity and accuracy.

These steps ensure a high-quality, impactful paper.

QIMS: Why do you choose to publish in QIMS?

Dr. Kirukhin: I choose to publish in QIMS because of its strong reputation, focus on translational research, and commitment to innovation. QIMS is known for its rigorous peer-review process and credibility within the medical imaging community, ensuring that my work meets high academic standards and gains visibility within both academic and clinical settings. The journal's emphasis on translational research is crucial, as it bridges the gap between technological advancements in imaging and their real-world clinical applications, aligning with my goal of improving patient care. Its interdisciplinary approach fosters collaboration across various specialties, enhancing the quality and impact of my research. QIMS’ open-access model also ensures that my work reaches a global audience, promoting wider dissemination of findings and facilitating global scientific dialogue. Additionally, the journal's focus on emerging technologies like AI and machine learning in imaging aligns with my interests, allowing my research to be part of cutting-edge developments. Finally, QIMS is committed to publishing research that drives clinical impact and improves patient outcomes, making it an ideal platform for my work to contribute to meaningful advancements in healthcare.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Lukas Lambert

Lukas Lambert serves as the head of the Department of Imaging Methods at Motol University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic, the largest imaging department in the Czech Republic, specializing in advanced imaging techniques for both adults and children. His research focuses on the development and implementation of cutting-edge technologies in magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) imaging, as well as the application of artificial intelligence in radiology. Dr. Lambert has authored numerous peer-reviewed articles, particularly in the fields of prostate MRI, whole-body MRI, neuroradiology, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. He has also fostered extensive national and international collaborations in clinical imaging contributing to advancements in critical areas of radiology.

QIMS: What are the qualities an author should possess?

Dr. Lambert: I have had the privilege of meeting numerous outstanding researchers and have observed several common traits among them. First and foremost, they exhibit exceptional patience and perseverance, often dedicating countless late-night hours to their work while others rest, take vacations, earn money, or simply enjoy themselves. In this pursuit, they remain unwavering, focusing on what they believe is essential without being swayed by external distractions. Another defining trait is a clear vision—one that they can effectively communicate to their collaborators, inspiring and guiding them toward a shared goal. This ability to articulate a compelling direction fosters motivation and cohesion within a research team, ultimately driving progress and innovation.

QIMS: The burden of being a scientist/doctor is heavy. How do you allocate time to write papers?

Dr. Lambert: Maximum efficiency is essential for successfully balancing research and clinical practice, as both fields demand significant time, focus, and dedication. In a clinical setting, patient care must remain the top priority, requiring prompt decision-making, meticulous attention to detail, and seamless coordination with colleagues. Simultaneously, research necessitates deep intellectual engagement, careful data analysis, and the ability to synthesize complex information into meaningful conclusions.

To sustain both pursuits without compromise, clinicians must adopt strategies that optimize workflow and minimize inefficiencies. This includes leveraging technology to streamline administrative tasks, prioritizing high-impact research questions, delegating responsibilities effectively within both clinical and research teams, and maintaining structured schedules that allow dedicated time for both activities.

QIMS: From an author’s perspective, do you think it is important to follow reporting guidelines (e.g. STROBE, PRISMA and CARE) during preparation of manuscripts?

Dr. Lambert: Checklists are valuable tools for ensuring that essential components of a scientific paper are not overlooked. While they may not be universally applicable to all types of research, they serve as useful frameworks for structuring manuscripts in a clear, transparent, and standardized manner. Their primary benefit lies in helping authors systematically include critical methodological and analytical details, improving the clarity and reproducibility of research. By following these guidelines, researchers can ensure that their work meets established standards without unnecessary omissions, which can enhance the quality of reporting and facilitate peer review. However, rigid adherence to checklists should not come at the expense of scientific nuance. Some studies may require flexibility in presentation, particularly when dealing with exploratory research, novel methodologies, or interdisciplinary work that does not fit neatly into predefined formats. In such cases, checklists should be viewed as guides rather than strict rules, ensuring completeness while allowing for necessary adaptations.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)

Diana Expósito Jimenez

Dr. Diana Expósito Jimenez is a radiologist who has specialized in musculoskeletal radiology since 2013. She has developed her healthcare activity in both public and private centers, focusing said activity especially on sports injuries, with both a diagnostic and therapeutic approach using image-guided interventional techniques. She is also a Member of the Spanish Musculoskeletal Radiology Society (SERME) and the European Skeletal Radiology Society (ESSR).

Dr. Jimenez believes that constant updating of knowledge is essential for both readers and authors. This ongoing learning is a fundamental aspect of daily work for researchers in any hospital or workplace around the world. Specifically, researchers must stay current with publications in their specialty and use effective literature search strategies to ensure their contributions are up to date.

“I am motivated to write by the desire to keep learning and keeping up to date. When you write an article on a particular subject, you learn a lot about that subject, and that knowledge stays with you, at least to a large extent,” says Dr. Jimenez.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Keisuke Sugahara

Dr. Keisuke Sugahara is an Associate Professor at the Department of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery at Tokyo Dental College in Japan. He is also a Fellow of the International Board for the Certification of Specialists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, a Specialist of the Japanese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, a Specialist of the Japanese Society of Oral Science, a Specialist of the Japanese Society of Jaw Deformity, and an Infection Controlled Doctor. His research areas include oncology, anatomy, temporomandibular joint, extended reality, and oral and maxillofacial surgery. His recent projects are patient-derived tumor xenograft, macroscopic anatomy on free flap using cadavers, establishment of a mouse model of mandibular condylar resection: morphological and histological observation of the healing process, digital technology for oral and maxillofacial surgery and education.

With an aim to solve clinical problems and questions, Dr. Sugahara constantly conducts research and shares his research results with his students and young doctors. He believes that continuing to publish articles in the world will lead to the future.

According to Dr. Sugahara, a series of inquiries are necessary to ensure effective critical writing on the subject matter. First, the underlying assumptions of the inquiry must be thoroughly examined. Next, a comprehensive analysis should be conducted that considers multiple perspectives. Ideas need to be synthesized, and the implications of the inquiry must be evaluated. It is also important to employ a logical structure and address counterarguments. Additionally, clarity and conciseness in the inquiry are essential. Finally, reflection on potential biases should be included.

“I oversee a number of research groups, each with a distinct theme. However, during a recent research meeting, I engaged in an extensive discussion about one of these groups, which led to criticism from a participant regarding the methodology for compiling an article, because I was in another group talking about a completely different research topic. My current focus is on promoting various research themes in a cohesive manner. I intend to provide further updates on any pertinent developments as they emerge. I request your patience and understanding. My sincere thanks to the members of each of my research groups,” says Dr. Sugahara.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Marina Valeryevna Cherkasskaya

Dr. Marina Cherkasskaya is a researcher in the Standardization and Quality Control Department at the Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department. She holds an engineering degree in "Technology of Processing of Plastic Masses and Elastomers" and a Ph.D. in Engineering in "Technology and Processing of Polymers and Composites" from Moscow State University of Design and Technology. Her research interests encompass the development and production of materials, fibers, and composites with the required complex properties. Since 2023, she has been actively involved in phantom modeling for various medical imaging techniques.

In Dr. Cherkasskaya’s view, when researchers share their findings across various platforms in the global scientific community, linguistic and cultural differences can lead to misinterpretation of their work. To address this, academic writing serves as a standardized approach, ensuring clarity and consistency in scientific articles during the writing and editing stages. It enhances the quality of texts, structures them effectively, and makes them accessible to an international audience. High-quality academic writing is essential for publishing in esteemed peer-reviewed journals and presenting at international conferences.

Dr. Cherkasskaya reckons that research data sharing is essential. It fosters collaboration among researchers, institutions, and even countries, enabling collective efforts to address complex challenges more efficiently. Moreover, open data allow for independent verification of results, ensuring the credibility and reproducibility of scientific findings. Open data also drive innovation, as researchers can build upon existing research. She contends that a scientific experiment is not truly complete until its results are shared with a broader audience.

“I would like to express my gratitude to all scientists dedicated to advancing global scientific knowledge. It is an honor to work with the talented Russian scientists at our Center. The progress of modern society relies fundamentally on science, which drives technological innovation and serves as a critical resource for the economy, medicine, and education. I wish all those dedicated to scientific research continued success, as well as new ideas and significant discoveries,” says Dr. Cherkasskaya.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Olga Yu

Dr. Olga Panina received her medical degree and completed her residency at the Moscow State Medical University named after A. I. Evdokimov Faculty of Medicine. She is a radiologist employed by the Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, where she works in the Complex Diagnostics Department of the Cancer Center. The Cancer Center uses innovative diagnostic techniques in the field of CT and MRI. She is a researcher at the Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine. Her scientific activity is centered on the development of phantoms, quality-assurance studies, and the application of quantitative biomarkers in MRI. Additionally, she serves as a guest reviewer for scientific journals, specifically the journal Digital Diagnostics, where she contributes her expertise in the field.

Dr. Panina believes that a well-written academic paper is a distinct piece of work. It is based on original research with a relevant subject and high-quality experiment. Undoubtedly, good academic work is well-structured. Such work includes a detailed analysis of materials and methods to ensure the possibility of replicating the experiment. As a radiologist, her interest lies in practical work that enhances imaging and research into new biomarkers in the field of radiology.

From Dr. Panina’s perspective, the author's key skills are undoubtedly a high level of proficiency in the field of science. In addition, attention to detail, patience, and the ability to present research findings in a simple and constructive manner are essential. Authors must possess critical thinking skills to objectively assess the pros and cons of their work. Today, an essential aspect of scientific activity is collaboration with fellow scholars and engagement in multidisciplinary research teams.

“Each academic writing project is interesting and different in its own way. It is definitely a challenging and time-consuming process. But with more experience, you become a highly skilled professional and you get more satisfaction from the final outcome,” says Dr. Panina.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Yedaun Lee

Yedaun Lee is a Professor of Radiology at Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine in Busan, South Korea, specializing in abdominal imaging. After receiving her M.D. from Korea University, she completed her radiology residency and fellowship training at Asan Medical Center. Her current research focuses on MR enterography, particularly protocol optimization and the application of deep learning-based reconstruction techniques. In recent projects, she has explored the clinical utility of fast imaging protocols in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, focusing on balancing diagnostic performance and patient comfort.

Dr. Lee thinks academic writing is fundamental to the development of medicine because it is the process through which evidence is generated, evaluated, and communicated. As a radiologist and clinician, she asserts that all medical practice must be grounded in evidence. Academic writing is the medium that transforms clinical observations and data—no matter how small—into structured knowledge that can be shared, critiqued, and expanded upon. Although large-scale randomized trials are essential, she believes that small but rigorously documented findings can contribute to the advancement of science no less significantly, by guiding future research directions. Every piece of data, when carefully written and published, becomes part of a greater scientific conversation. It is through writing that we connect with peers globally, contribute to progress, and ultimately improve patient care. To her, academic writing is not just a scholarly exercise—it is a core responsibility of the physician-scientist.

In Dr. Lee’s view, critical academic writing requires more than simply presenting data—it demands thoughtful engagement with existing literature, recognition of limitations, and a balanced interpretation of results. She believes the first step is intellectual humility: to question one’s own methods and assumptions and to acknowledge that every study exists within a broader scientific context. Writing critically also means positioning one’s findings in relation to others—not just to support arguments, but to evaluate their significance objectively. Peer review plays an essential role here. Although she aims to publish in high-impact journals as a measure of rigor and originality, she also respects that influence is not solely defined by impact factors. Some of the most meaningful contributions in the field have come from modest publications that later became highly cited. Ultimately, critical writing is about honesty, clarity, and contribution—not prestige alone.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Sven S. Walter

Dr. Sven S. Walter is a board-certified radiologist who completed his radiology residency at the University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany. He subsequently pursued a research fellowship in musculoskeletal radiology at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine in New York City, USA, followed by a clinical fellowship in interventional radiology at the University Hospital Tuebingen. Currently, he serves as the section head of ambulatory radiology and deputy section head of interventional radiology at the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen. His clinical expertise encompasses both musculoskeletal imaging and interventional radiology, with a focus on musculoskeletal treatments.

Haidara Almansour

Dr. Haidara Almansour is a board-certified radiologist with a strong interest in clinical radiology, education, and research. He completed his radiology residency at Tuebingen University Hospital in Tuebingen, Germany. He is currently completing a clinical fellowship in Vascular and Interventional Radiology at Vancouver General Hospital and the University of British Columbia Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Following this, he will pursue further training in Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology. He has served as an Associate and Deputy Editor for the Radiology trainee editorial board (Radiology in Training, RSNA) and as an Associate Editor for RSNA's open-access journal, Radiology Advances.

QIMS: What do you regard as a good academic paper?

Dr. Walter and Dr. Almansour: A good paper is a concise, well-structured report of a research study with a clearly defined question. It allows the reader to quickly grasp the study’s purpose, understand the results, and replicate the findings. A strong paper also places its findings within the broader scientific context and acknowledges the study’s limitations. Ultimately, a good paper does more than just contribute to the literature—it sparks discussion and provides direction for future research to validate findings or push the boundaries of understanding further.

QIMS: How do you avoid biases in one’s writing?

Dr. Walter and Dr. Almansour: Humility is essential in avoiding biases in writing. Recognizing that your work is only a small part of the extensive body of scientific literature helps you maintain perspective. When presenting your results, avoid exaggeration. Acknowledge the limitations of your research and remain vigilant about potential biases—both in your study and in your interpretation of the findings. A critical, self-aware approach ensures that your work remains objective and credible.

QIMS: Would you like to say a few words to encourage other academic writers who have been devoting themselves to advancing scientific progress?

Dr. Almansour: During my residency training, my mentor told me, “Research is all about frustration tolerance.” These words have stuck with me and continue to guide me through the challenges of academia. Progress in science is often slow and demanding, but perseverance is what drives discovery. Keep pushing forward, stay focused, and trust that your dedication will make an impact.

(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)

Felix Corr

Felix Corr is a neurosurgical resident at the Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Switzerland. Originally trained as a paramedic and surgical assistant in Germany, he pursued a medical degree with a focus on neurosurgery and completed a Master of Science in Neurosurgery at the University of Buckingham, UK. He previously coordinated the neurosurgical research labs at University Hospital of Mainz and held guest researcher positions at the University Hospital of Marburg and Isarklinikum Munich in Germany. His current areas of interest include neurooncology, with an emphasis on glioblastoma, and complex spine surgery. Dr. Corr has collaborated on international projects across Germany and Switzerland and completed a clinical observership at the Barrow Neurological Institute in the U.S. He is also part of the Journal of Neurosurgery social media team, promoting global neurosurgical education. He aims to bridge clinical care with translational research, especially in biomarker-driven risk stratification and immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Follow him on ResearchGate and LinkedIn.

“Language matters, but it is clarity of thought that truly defines good writing,” says Dr. Corr, who believes the ability to structure complex ideas into accessible narratives is essential in academic writing. Precision, curiosity, and critical thinking shape the foundation. But above all, he believes it is the discipline to revise, and the humility to learn from feedback, that help writers grow.

To avoid biases in one’s writing, Dr. Corr reckons that one has to start by admitting that there are biases. Bias often hides in what we take for granted, so he makes it a habit to regularly challenge his own assumptions. Reading widely, including voices that he may initially disagree with, helps sharpen his perspective. Data should lead, not personal opinion. And peer review is the reality check that every author needs.

“For me, there’s no external pressure of ‘publish or perish’. I write because I choose to. On one hand, it sharpens my clinical intuition and forces me to question what I assume I know. On the other hand, it’s a creative momentum alongside clinical work. It is a space where I can think freely, test ideas, and connect the dots beyond protocols. I don’t feel obligated to write; I simply enjoy it with genuine interest. Critical thinking isn’t just a skill; it’s essential to stay current and to care for patients in the best way possible. What keeps me motivated is knowing that a meaningful idea, clearly articulated and shared at the right time, may improve patient care or advance our collective understanding. That’s the kind of work I want to be part of,” says Dr. Corr.

(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)