Computed tomography (CT) characteristics and pathologic basis of ciliated muconodular papillary tumors of the lung
Introduction
Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor (CMPT) is an extremely infrequent entity first described by Ishikawa in 2002 (1). Gradually, with the application of low-dose computed tomography (CT) and artificial intelligence, more pulmonary nodules were detected, and related case reports of CMPT increased (2,3). Recently, CMPT was introduced as a novel entity in the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Thoracic Tumors and considered to be a type of benign pulmonary adenoma (4). It consists of ciliated columnar cells, mucinous cells, and basal cells with distinctive papillary architecture (5). The majority of the literature has focused on the clinical and pathological features of CMPT, while CT characteristics have rarely been systematically described. Commonly, the tumor appeared as a solitary and peripheral nodule on CT scans and was easily misdiagnosed as lung cancer (6-8). In this study, we retrospectively collected a cohort of 27 patients with pathologically confirmed CMPT and analyzed CT findings of tumors and the corresponding pathological basis in these patients.
Methods
Patient cohorts
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, and individual informed consent for this retrospective analysis was waived. We retrospectively collected and reviewed the medical records of patients with small pulmonary nodules who underwent surgical resection at the General Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army and the affiliated Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University from January 2012 to June 2022. Patients were eligible for enrollment when they met the following criteria: (I) a surgical pathological diagnosis of CMPT and (II) received thin-slice CT scans in our institutions. Follow-up time in this study was defined as the duration from the date of the first CT examination to the last preoperative CT examination.
Radiological and histopathologic assessment
The chest CT examinations were performed with either a 64-Slice GE LightSpeed CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Beijing, China) or a Siemens SOMATOM Sensation 128-Slice CT Scanner (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). The parameters for CT screenings were as follows: routine section thickness, 1.0–1.5 mm; section thickness after reconstruction, 0.625–1.25 mm; 80–120 kV; 200–300 mAs. These CT images were reviewed and assessed on setting the lung window (width, 1,500 HU; level, −600 HU) and mediastinal windows (width, 350 HU; level, 40 HU). Chest CT images were reviewed for tumor location, size, and external and internal characteristics. The average value of the maximum diameter on axial images was used for tumor size. Pulmonary nodules were classified into solid nodules (SNs) and subsolid nodules according to the absence of ground glass opacities (GGOs). In subsolid nodules, a pure ground glass nodule (pGGN) was defined as a nodule with only GGO, and a part-solid nodule (PSN) was defined as a nodule with both GGO and solid components. Internal characteristics of the tumor, including vascular changes (dilated, rigid, convergent, or tortuous blood vessels observed on consecutive axial, coronal, or sagittal reconstruction images), air bronchogram (branching or tubular air density surrounded by tumor tissue on CT scans and could be distinguished in consecutive multiple reconstruction images), and air-containing space (presence of round or oval air-filled spaces in the tumor with a relatively thin wall), were recorded. External characteristics, including lobulation (uneven lobular outline caused by variance in tumor growth), spiculation (radiating and tiny burr around the tumor margin) and pleural retraction, were also observed and recorded. A cardiopulmonary radiologist (J Wu) with 20 years of experience and a pulmonary radiologist (C Wu) with 15 years of experience conducted the evaluation work, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
The resected specimens were fixed in 4% neutral formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, sliced at a thickness of 3–5 µm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed with antibodies against thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), napsin A, p63, p40, cytokeratin 5 (CK5), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and Ki-67. All pathological slices were scanned through Pannoramic MIDI digital slice scanning (3DHIESTECH, Hungary). The software CaseViewers was used to review tumors. Two experienced senior pathologists (J Gao, Y Xie) conducted histopathologic examination without being informed of the clinical information. If there was any disagreement during the evaluation, they reassessed them by consensus. The histopathological diagnostic criteria for CMPT were determined according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors. The mucin score could be graded into 3 categories according to the scoring system reported by a previous system (8): (I) score 1 indicates mucin amount <30%, (II) score 2 represents mucin amount within 30–70%, and (III) score 3 represents mucin amount >70%.
Statistical analysis
All data analysis in this research was performed with SPSS (version 26.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Continuous variables such as age, tumor size, and smoking index were expressed as the means ± standard deviations with ranges. Categorical variables, including sex, smoking history, symptoms and CT characteristics, were described with counts and percentages, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for observed variables were also expressed. The interobserver agreement for the internal and external characteristics of the tumor was investigated by using the κ statistic. A κ value of 0–0.20 was considered poor agreement; 0.21–0.40, fair agreement; 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80, good agreement; and 0.81–1.00, perfect agreement.
Results
Clinical characteristics
In this study, the final patient cohort consisted of 27 patients (mean age, 56.15±10.20 years; age range, 36–71 years) with CMPT. As summarized in Table 1, 11 (40.7%) of the 27 patients were men, and 16 (59.3%) were women. Only 5 (18.5%) of the 27 patients had a smoking history, and the mean pack-years among smokers was 28.3±10.5 (range, 15–40) pack-years. More than half of the cohort [22 patients (81.5%)] was asymptomatic, and the tumor was detected incidentally during physical check-up or examination for other disease processes. Five patients had clinical symptoms at presentation: coughing and expectoration of sputum in three patients and chest pain in two patients. Regarding treatment, most patients (77.8%) underwent wedge resection.
Table 1
Clinical characteristics | Patients (n=27) |
---|---|
Age (years) | 56.15±10.20 [36–71] |
Sex | |
Male | 11 (40.7) |
Female | 16 (59.3) |
Smoking history | |
Yes/ever | 5 (18.5) |
No/never | 22 (81.5) |
Smoking index | 28.3±10.5 [15–40] |
Clinical symptoms | |
Asymptomatic | 22 (81.5) |
Cough/expectoration/chest pain | 5 (18.5) |
Treatment | |
Wedge resection | 21 (77.8) |
Partial resection | 3 (11.1) |
Lobectomy | 3 (11.1) |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation [range] or number (%).
CT characteristics of CMPT
Table 2 displays the interobserver agreement for the evaluated radiological features. The κ value was perfect for category of nodule, 0.919 (95% CI: 0.762–1.076); lobulation, 0.914 (95% CI: 0.749–1.079); spiculation, 0.886 (95% CI: 0.668–1.104); vascular changes, 0.834 (95% CI: 0.616–1.052); air-bronchogram, 0.852 (95% CI: 0.658–1.046); air-containing space, 0.908 (95% CI: 0.732–1.084) and pleura retraction, 0.919 (95% CI: 0.764–1.074); and moderate to boundary of tumor, 0.647 (95% CI: 0.335–0.959).
Table 2
Radiological characteristics | Kappa value | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
Category of nodule | 0.919 | 0.762–1.076 |
Lobulation | 0.914 | 0.749–1.079 |
Spiculation | 0.886 | 0.668–1.104 |
Vascular changes | 0.834 | 0.616–1.052 |
Air-bronchogram | 0.852 | 0.658–1.046 |
Air-containing space | 0.908 | 0.732–1.084 |
Pleural retraction | 0.919 | 0.764–1.074 |
Margin of tumor | 0.647 | 0.335–0.959 |
CI, confidence interval.
The radiological characteristics are shown in Table 3. All tumors appeared as solitary nodules. pGGN, PSNs and SNs were detected in 2/27 (7.4%), 17/27 (63.0%), and 8/27 (29.6%) patients, respectively. Twenty-one tumors (77.8%) were located in the lower lobe. The average tumor size was 1.21±0.74 (range, 0.44–3.46) cm. Eighteen (66.7%) of the 27 patients had tumors with lobulation contours. Only six (22.2%) tumors showed spiculation contours. Fifteen patients (55.6%) had air bronchograms in the tumor, and 19 patients (70.4%) had air-containing space. Dilated, rigid, convergent, or tortuous blood vessels were observed in the tumors of 10 patients (37.0%), and pleura retraction was observed in 18 (66.7%) patients. Eighteen (66.7%) patients had tumors with well-defined margins. Several CT features could often be seen in one patient (Figure 1). Seventeen patients had their previous chest CT images available. Of these 17 patients, 15 were followed up for at least 6 months. The mean follow-up period was 1.6±1.9 years, ranging from 0.3 to 8 years. During the follow-up, there were two patients whose tumor size increased and was accompanied by an increase in solid components (Figure 2).
Table 3
Radiological characteristics | Patients (n=27) |
---|---|
Category of nodule | |
pGGN | 2 (7.4) |
PSN | 17 (63.0) |
SN | 8 (29.6) |
Location | |
Right upper lobe | 3 (11.1) |
Right middle lobe | 2 (7.4) |
Right lower lobe | 8 (29.6) |
Left upper lobe | 1 (3.7) |
Left lower lobe | 13 (48.2) |
Tumor size (cm) | 1.21±0.74 |
Lobulation | |
Positive | 18 (66.7) |
Negative | 9 (33.3) |
Spiculation | |
Positive | 6 (22.2) |
Negative | 21 (77.8) |
Vascular changes | |
Positive | 10 (37.0) |
Negative | 17 (63.0) |
Air-bronchogram | |
Positive | 15 (55.6) |
Negative | 12 (44.4) |
Air-containing space | |
Positive | 19 (70.4) |
Negative | 8 (29.6) |
Pleura retraction | |
Positive | 18 (66.7) |
Negative | 9 (33.3) |
Margin of tumor | |
Well defined | 18 (66.7) |
Poorly defined | 9 (33.3) |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or number (%). CT, computed tomography; pGGN, pure ground glass nodule; PSN, part-solid nodule; SN, solid nodule.
Pathological basis
The postoperative histopathologic examination revealed that the tumor featured a papillary structure and was surrounded by mucus, and tumor cells floating on the ‘mucoid lake’ could be observed. For intratumoral mucus evaluation, 15 patients had mucin score 3, 8 patients had mucin score 2 and 4 patients had mucin score 1. The lesion area was often fairly well demarcated from the surrounding parenchyma (Figure 3), which correlated with the imaging finding of well-defined margins. A large amount of extracellular mucus filled and dilated the surrounding pulmonary alveoli. The papillary tumor nodule and extravasating mucus sometimes formed a double boundary (Figure 3D). On high-power field imaging, the tumor was composed of ciliated columnar cells, mucous cells and basal cells. The basal layer with basal cells was often observed, on top of which lay ciliated and mucous cells (Figure 4). Malignant invasive behavior of tumor cells, such as nuclear atypia, mitotic figures, and necrosis, was absent. However, prominent reactive changes, including lymphoid aggregates and chronic inflammation, were evident in peripheral areas of the tumor (Figure 4A). Immunohistochemical analysis is summarized in Table 4, and the proliferation index (Ki-67) was low (1–10%) (Figure 5A). In this research, all tumors expressed p63 and CK5 in the basal cell layer (Figure 5B,5C), although the area of coverage was both focal in two cases and broad in the others. TTF-1, p40, and CK7 were typically positive (Figure 5D-5F), while CK20 was negative in all tumors. Napsin A was weakly positive in a small portion of cells. All tumors were diagnosed as CMPTs. Notably, there is a particular case of CMPT accompanied by adenocarcinoma found in a patient. Focal adenocarcinoma manifested in partial peripheral regions (Figure 6).
Table 4
Outcome | TTF-1 | p63 | p40 | CK5 | CK7 | CK20 | Napsin A |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | 21 (77.8) | 27 (100.0) | 17 (63.0) | 27 (100.0) | 22 (81.5) | 0 | 10 (37.0) |
Negative | 6 (22.2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 (100.0) | 7 (26.0) |
NA | 0 | 0 | 10 (37.0) | 0 | 5 (18.5) | 0 | 10 (37.0) |
Data are presented as numbers (frequencies). CMPT, ciliated muconodular papillary tumor; TTF-1, thyroid transcription factor 1; CK5, cytokeratin 5; CK7, cytokeratin 7; CK20, cytokeratin 20.
Discussion
CMPTs are termed rare pulmonary tumors and feature papillary architecture. This tumor is reported to affect mostly middle-aged and elderly patients, but involvement in teenagers has been documented (9,10). Previous studies have reported the coexistence of peribronchiolar metaplasia with cellular components similar to CMPT and have suggested that smoking may play a role in the process of metaplasia to neoplasia (11). However, only a few cases of CMPT have been reported to have a smoking history. The pathogenesis of CMPT needs further investigation. Generally, most CMPT cases are asymptomatic and detected incidentally via CT screening for lung cancer or medical check-up. Only 5 patients complained of cough, expectoration or chest pain in our research. All 27 patients had abnormal pulmonary shadows on pulmonary CT images and underwent tumor resection for suspicion of lung cancer, and postoperative pathology finally confirmed CMPT.
Previous studies have briefly reported that CMPT is a solitary nodule that is often located in the pulmonary lower lobes (12,13). In this research, we systematically described the radiological features of CMPT of the lung. Similarly, CMPT of the lung mostly appeared as a lobulation contour and well-defined solitary tumor. It can appear as a solitary pGGN, PSN or SN and is mostly detected at the periphery of the pulmonary lower lobe. The presence of GGO was considered to be correlated with an unfilled alveolar cavity (14,15). We thought the filled mucus containing air in pulmonary alveoli may be the explanation for GGO appearance. Additionally, the tumor was mostly found to have an air-containing space. Pathologically, in the central tumor, the alveoli were destroyed and filled with a large amount of mucus, with discharge of mucus through the bronchi, and thus, an air-containing space formed. Pleural retraction of the tumor could also be observed on CT scans, especially in those closer to the pleura. CMPT was reported to be a small tumor with a slow growth rate (8). In the present cases, the tumor size ranged from 0.44 to 3.46 cm, with an average size of 1.21 cm. This is similar to the previously reported size of 1.18 cm (16). The most important differential diagnostic consideration for CMPT is adenocarcinoma. Both of them can appear as GGO or subsolid on CT scans. It is still difficult to distinguish CMPT from adenocarcinoma by CT features. However, some malignant CT features, such as spiculation and pleural retraction, are frequently observed in lung cancer and may be helpful to differentiate CMPT and adenocarcinoma. Additionally, more cases would be beneficial to help in the differential diagnosis of CMPT in the future. During the preoperative follow-up, there were two patients with tumor size enlargement accompanied by solid component increase. Notably, one patient with a solid tumor component was finally diagnosed with CMPT accompanied by adenocarcinoma.
Previous studies have discussed the nature of CMPT, but consensus has not been reached. Some studies have described CMPT as a low-grade malignant tumor (17-19). The destroyed alveolar structures, micropapillary pattern, and replacement of the alveolar epithelium by tumor cells on pathology examination and positive molecular biological characteristics indicate the malignancy of CMPT (20-22). In contrast, other studies thought CMPT to be benign due to its indolent clinical course and good prognosis after surgical resection (23-26). In the 2021 WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumors, CMPT was finally recognized as a type of pulmonary adenoma with a benign nature (4). It represents an incidental lesion and remained free of disease after surgical resection. Remarkably, previous studies reported cases of CMPT accompanied by malignant lung tumors. One CMPT accompanied by adenocarcinoma in situ in a 53-year-old patient and another CMPT accompanied by invasive acinar adenocarcinoma in a 79-year-old patient have been documented in the past (27,28). In addition, mucinous adenocarcinoma caused by cancerization from a ciliated multinodular papilloma tumor has also been reported (29). Similarly, there was a particular case of CMPT accompanied by adenocarcinoma in our series. Given the finite available information regarding CMPT, it is necessary to further investigate the biological properties and relationship related to the potential for malignant transformation. Surgical intervention is the optimal treatment for CMPT, and wedge resection is the mainstream choice. Similar to previous studies, the patient with CMPT accompanied by adenocarcinoma in this research also received adjuvant therapy after surgery. Although no recurrence or metastasis has been reported, long-term follow-up is still warranted.
There are several limitations in this study. First, the number of patients in this retrospective study was small. However, to our knowledge, this study is the first to systematically describe the detailed radiological features of CMPT. Second, a comprehensive molecular test was not conducted, and driver mutation analysis was not provided. Further investigation of the research will be continued.
Conclusions
CMPTs of the lung mostly manifest as solitary, lobulated, well-defined tumors with air-containing spaces on CT and occur in the periphery of the pulmonary lower lobe. When CT findings meet these criteria, the possibility of CMPT should be taken into consideration. Additionally, CMPT can coexist with adenocarcinoma. Further investigation will contribute significantly to the biological properties of CMPT and its relationship to the potential for malignant transformation.
Acknowledgments
Funding: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 62176166 and 62076254).
Footnote
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-22-1258/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, and individual informed consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
References
- Ishikawa Y. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor of the peripheral lung: benign or malignant? Pathol Clin Med 2002;20:964-5.
- Chuang HW, Liao JB, Chang HC, Wang JS, Lin SL, Hsieh PP. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor of the lung: a newly defined peripheral pulmonary tumor with conspicuous mucin pool mimicking colloid adenocarcinoma: a case report and review of literature. Pathol Int 2014;64:352-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kamata T, Yoshida A, Kosuge T, Watanabe S, Asamura H, Tsuta K. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumors of the lung: a clinicopathologic analysis of 10 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2015;39:753-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nicholson AG, Tsao MS, Beasley MB, Borczuk AC, Brambilla E, Cooper WA, Dacic S, Jain D, Kerr KM, Lantuejoul S, Noguchi M, Papotti M, Rekhtman N, Scagliotti G, van Schil P, Sholl L, Yatabe Y, Yoshida A, Travis WD. The 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Advances Since 2015. J Thorac Oncol 2022;17:362-87. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hata Y, Yuasa R, Sato F, Otsuka H, Goto H, Isobe K, Mitsuda A, Wakayama M, Shibuya K, Takagi K, Watanabe Y. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor of the lung: a newly defined low-grade malignant tumor with CT findings reminiscent of adenocarcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013;43:205-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zheng Q, Luo R, Jin Y, Shen X, Shan L, Shen L, Hou Y, Li Y. So-called "non-classic" ciliated muconodular papillary tumors: a comprehensive comparison of the clinicopathological and molecular features with classic ciliated muconodular papillary tumors. Hum Pathol 2018;82:193-201. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lu YW, Yeh YC. Ciliated Muconodular Papillary Tumors of the Lung. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2019;143:135-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Onishi Y, Kusumoto M, Motoi N, Watanabe H, Watanabe SI. Ciliated Muconodular Papillary Tumor of the Lung: Thin-Section CT Findings of 16 Cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;214:761-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kon T, Baba Y, Fukai I, Watanabe G, Uchiyama T, Murata T. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor of the lung: A report of five cases. Pathol Int 2016;66:633-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lau KW, Aubry MC, Tan GS, Lim CH, Takano AM. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor: a solitary peripheral lung nodule in a teenage girl. Hum Pathol 2016;49:22-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cheung FMF, Guan J, Luo QG, Sihoe ADL, Shen XP. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumour of the lung mimicking mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review. Hong Kong Med J 2019;25:71-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Onishi Y, Ito K, Motoi N, Morita T, Watanabe SI, Kusumoto M. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor of the lung: 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of 15 cases. Ann Nucl Med 2020;34:448-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jin Y, Shen X, Shen L, Sun Y, Chen H, Li Y. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor of the lung harboring ALK gene rearrangement: Case report and review of the literature. Pathol Int 2017;67:171-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhang Y, Fu F, Chen H. Management of Ground-Glass Opacities in the Lung Cancer Spectrum. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;110:1796-804. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, Mehta AC, Ohno Y, Powell CA, Prokop M, Rubin GD, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Travis WD, Van Schil PE, Bankier AA. Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017;284:228-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang Y, Wang D, Wang J, Zhao S, Ren D, Chen G, Wang Q, Xu D, Xu S. Primary ciliated muconodular papillary tumor: A rare pulmonary disease and literature review of 65 cases. Thorac Cancer 2021;12:1917-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shao K, Wang Y, Xue Q, Mu J, Gao Y, Wang Y, Wang B, Zhou L, Gao S. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of ciliated muconodular papillary tumor. J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;14:143. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sato S, Koike T, Homma K, Yokoyama A. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumour of the lung: a newly defined low-grade malignant tumour. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;11:685-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yang Y, Xie X, Jiang G, Zhang L, Liu H. Clinicopathological characteristic of ciliated muconodular papillary tumour of the lung. J Clin Pathol 2022;75:128-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Miyai K, Takeo H, Nakayama T, Obara K, Aida S, Sato K, Matsukuma S. Invasive form of ciliated muconodular papillary tumor of the lung: A case report and review of the literature. Pathol Int 2018;68:530-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chu HH, Park SY, Cha EJ. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor of the lung: The risk of false-positive diagnosis in frozen section. Human Pathology: Case Reports 2017;7:8-10.
- Taguchi R, Higuchi K, Sudo M, Misawa K, Miyamoto T, Mishima O, Kitano M, Azuhata K, Ito N. A case of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive ciliated muconodular papillary tumor (CMPT) of the lung. Pathol Int 2017;67:99-104. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mikubo M, Maruyama R, Kakinuma H, Yoshida T, Satoh Y. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumors of the lung: Cytologic features and diagnostic pitfalls in intraoperative examinations. Diagn Cytopathol 2019;47:716-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Moon J, You S, Sun JS, Park KJ, Koh YW. Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor of the lung with cavitary change: A case report with 11-year preoperative follow-up. Thorac Cancer 2022;13:1866-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yao X, Gong Y, Zhou J, Lyu M, Zhang H, Zhou H, Luo Q, Liu L. A surgical case of ciliated muconodular papillary tumor. Thorac Cancer 2019;10:1019-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Liu L, Aesif SW, Kipp BR, Voss JS, Daniel S, Aubry MC, Boland JM. Ciliated Muconodular Papillary Tumors of the Lung Can Occur in Western Patients and Show Mutations in BRAF and AKT1. Am J Surg Pathol 2016;40:1631-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhao L, Willson CM, Givens NT, Zhu Z, Wakefield MR, Wang Y, Yang W, Fang Y. A rare case of ciliated muconodular papillary tumor accompanied with adenocarcinoma in situ. BMC Pulm Med 2021;21:223. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang F, Shen MH, Cao D, Lv JH. Malignant Ciliated Muconodular Papillary Tumors of the Lung: A Case Report. Int J Surg Pathol 2021;29:520-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chen F, Ren F, Zhao H, Xu X, Chen J. Mucinous adenocarcinoma caused by cancerization from a ciliated multinodular papilloma tumor: A case report. Thorac Cancer 2021;12:1629-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]