How to cite item

Quantitative ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) for diagnosis of early cartilage degeneration: comparison with UTE-T2* and T2 mapping

  
@article{QIMS33280,
	author = {Jiawei Yang and Hongda Shao and Yajun Ma and Lidi Wan and Yixuan Zhang and Junjie Jiang and Jiang Du and Guangyu Tang},
	title = {Quantitative ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) for diagnosis of early cartilage degeneration: comparison with UTE-T2* and T2 mapping},
	journal = {Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery},
	volume = {10},
	number = {1},
	year = {2019},
	keywords = {},
	abstract = {Background: To investigate the feasibility of using quantitative ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) technique in diagnosing early cartilage degeneration and to compare the technique’s diagnostic efficacy with UTE-T2* mapping and T2 mapping.
Methods: Twenty human anterolateral condyle specimens with degeneration were obtained from volunteers undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA); they then underwent magnetic resonance (MR) scan on a clinical 3.0T scanner (GE, MR750). Seventy-two regions of interest (ROI) were manually drawn on specimens for UTE-MT, UTE-T2*, and T2 measurement, and the corresponding cartilage-bone regions were further divided into degeneration classifications of normal (n=11, Mankin scores 0–1), mild (n=28, Mankin scores 2–5), moderate (n=21, Mankin scores 6–9), and severe (n=12, Mankin scores 10–14) based on histological measures of degeneration (i.e., Mankin scores) as a reference standard. Differences among groups and correlations between quantitative MR parameters and Mankin scores were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tamhane-T2, LSD, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The receiver- operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of different quantitative MR parameters for the detection of mild cartilage degeneration.
Results: The UTE magnetization transfer ratio (UTE-MTR) in the normal group was significantly different from the mild group (P=0.021), moderate group (P},
	issn = {2223-4306},	url = {https://qims.amegroups.org/article/view/33280}
}