Quantitative analysis of orbital soft tissue for the detection of dysthyroid optic neuropathy in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, based on three-dimensional cube fast spin-echo Flex
Original Article

Quantitative analysis of orbital soft tissue for the detection of dysthyroid optic neuropathy in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, based on three-dimensional cube fast spin-echo Flex

Weiqiang Liang1,2#, Yanqiang Ma3#, Yu Chen1, Yali Zhao1,4, Yangyang Yin1, Linhan Zhai1, Ban Luo5, Gang Yuan6, Qiuxia Wang1, Jing Zhang1

1Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; 2Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; 3Department of Ultrasound Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; 4Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; 5Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; 6Department of Endocrinology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: J Zhang, W Liang; (II) Administrative support: Q Wang; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: B Luo, G Yuan; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Y Ma, Y Chen, Y Zhao; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: W Liang, Y Yin, L Zhai; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence to: Jing Zhang, MD, PhD. Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, #1095 Jiefang Road, Wuhan 430030, China. Email: tjh_jingzhang@hust.edu.cn.

Background: Dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) is a vision-threatening complication of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO). The underlying pathophysiology is believed to involve compression of the optic nerve at the orbital apex, primarily due to edema and volumetric expansion of orbital soft tissues. Early detection of DON is crucial to prevent irreversible visual loss. However, reliable imaging biomarkers for early diagnosis remain limited. This study aimed to investigate whether orbital soft tissue volume and water fraction (WF), derived from three-dimensional cube fast spin-echo Flex (3D Cube FSE-Flex) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can serve as predictive markers for DON in TAO patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 3D Cube FSE-Flex MRI images and clinical data were analyzed from 60 patients with TAO (27 with DON, 33 without). A total of 116 orbits (53 with DON, 63 without) were included. Quantitative measurements of extraocular muscle volume (EOMV), water fraction of extraocular muscles (EOM-WF), and orbital fat (OF-WF) were obtained using semi-automated segmentation. Group comparisons were performed using appropriate statistical tests. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for DON, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to evaluate diagnostic performance. Correlation analysis was conducted to assess relationships between imaging parameters and clinical activity scores (CAS).

Results: DON orbits showed significantly higher EOMV, EOM-WF, and OF-WF compared to non-DON orbits (all P<0.001). Logistic regression revealed that increased EOMV [odds ratio (OR) =1.555; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.250–1.934] and higher OF-WF (OR =1.190; 95% CI: 1.064–1.332) were independent risk factors for DON. A combined model incorporating EOMV and OF-WF demonstrated good diagnostic performance [area under the curve (AUC) =0.843]. Additionally, both EOMV (P=0.015, r=0.333) and OF-WF (P=0.025, r=0.308) were positively correlated with CAS.

Conclusions: Quantitative MRI analysis using 3D Cube FSE-Flex reveals that enlargement and edema of orbital soft tissues—specifically EOMV and OF-WF—are significant risk factors for DON. The combination of these parameters provides a robust imaging biomarker for early identification of DON in TAO patients, with potential clinical utility in risk stratification and treatment planning.

Keywords: Dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON); orbital soft tissue; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 3D Cube FSE-Flex


Submitted Apr 20, 2025. Accepted for publication Sep 26, 2025. Published online Nov 17, 2025.

doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-935


Introduction

Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease that can cause significant visual impairment (1,2). Dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) is the most severe complication associated with TAO, occurring in approximately 3–7% of these patients (3). The exact mechanisms underlying the development of DON remain unclear, although it is believed that compression injury to the optic nerve caused by orbital tip compression may be the primary cause (4,5). Without prompt intervention, DON can result in permanent vision loss. Therefore, early identification and appropriate treatment are crucial for reversing visual impairment. The primary etiology of orbital apical squeeze is attributed to edema and an augmented volume of the orbital soft tissues (6). Consequently, a quantitative evaluation of edema and volumetric alterations in the orbital soft tissues could potentially enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis and facilitate early detection of DON.

The precision of volumetric measurements is contingent upon accurately discerning the signal discrepancy between the region of interest (ROI) and its adjacent tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exhibits excellent differentiation of soft tissue and is well-suited for assessing orbital lesions (7,8). The three-dimensional (3D) Cube fast spin-echo (FSE)-Flex sequence represents an innovative MRI technique, employing a single-layer 3D water-fat separation sequence, which yields isotropic images that are particularly conducive to quantifying orbital soft tissue volume (9). Moreover, the implementation of the Cube FSE-Flex sequence’s water-fat separation technique guarantees precise demarcation of ROIs during semi-automatic segmentation (9). This is achieved through the provision of diverse contrast data sets encompassing Inphase, Outphase, Water phase, and Fat phase. Additionally, the inclusion of water and fat phase images enables direct image-based quantification of water content, thereby facilitating the evaluation of inflammatory edema within the orbital soft tissues. Consequently, this sequence emerges as a reliable approach for evaluating both structural and functional alterations in the orbital soft tissues (10).

Current DON diagnosis primarily relies on clinical signs (e.g., visual acuity decline, color vision defects) and structural optic nerve changes on imaging. However, these manifestations often occur late in the disease course, when irreversible nerve damage may already be established (11). Conventional orbital imaging (CT/MRI) focuses on anatomical crowding at the orbital apex, but lacks standardized quantitative metrics to objectively evaluate early edema and volumetric changes in orbital soft tissues—key drivers of optic nerve compression (12). This creates a critical diagnostic gap where early intervention opportunities may be missed. The 3D Cube FSE-Flex sequence addresses these limitations by enabling precise quantification of tissue volume and water fraction (WF), providing objective biomarkers of inflammatory edema before irreversible visual loss occurs.

The objective of this study was to examine alterations in orbital soft tissue volume and WF in patients with TAO, with and without DON, utilizing the 3D CUBE FSE-Flex technique. The purpose was to ascertain whether changes in tissue WF and volume of orbital soft tissue could serve as a potential biomarker for DON. We present this article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-2025-935/rc).


Methods

Study subjects

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital (No. ChiECRCT-20170087), and informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

A total of 27 patients diagnosed with DON and 33 age and sex matched individuals with TAO without DON were recruited from the Department of Endocrinology at Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China) between August 2018 and March 2019. The diagnosis of all patients was made collaboratively by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists possessing intermediate or higher qualifications. The diagnostic criteria employed are as follows: (I) the diagnosis of TAO relies on the diagnostic criteria established by Bartley et al. in 1995 (13); (II) patients who have been diagnosed with TAO may also be diagnosed with DON if they fulfill a minimum of two of the subsequent criteria: Unexplained decline in visual acuity (VA), loss of color perception, visual field impairments, abnormalities in visual evoked potentials, swelling of the optic disc, relative afferent pupillary defects, and imaging indications of orbital apical extrusion.

The exclusion criteria encompassed the following: (I) the presence of other neurological or ophthalmic disorders that could impact visual function, such as cataract, glaucoma, neuritis of ischemic or inflammatory origin, multiple sclerosis, diabetic retinopathy, uncorrected high astigmatism, and myopia; (II) the manifestation of severe corneal exposure symptoms, including diffuse punctate keratopathy, ulcers, abscesses, and white spots; (III) a medical history involving steroid therapy, radiation therapy, or surgical decompression; and (IV) insufficient image quality (defined as: visible motion artifacts affecting >10% of orbital slices; incomplete coverage of orbital apex; severe water-fat separation failures).

Clinical materials

Upon admission, pertinent medical history data were gathered, encompassing sex, age, duration of Graves’ disease, history of radioactive iodine-131 (131I) treatment, and smoking habits. Two ophthalmologists evaluated the clinical activity scores (CAS) for patients with DON and TAO. Additionally, measurements of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4), and thyrotropin receptor antibody (TRAb) levels were documented. The CAS and thyroid function tests were performed within 48 hours before MRI acquisition to ensure temporal correlation. All participants were subjected to a thorough ophthalmic examination encompassing evaluations of VA, color vision, refraction, intraocular pressure, slit lamp microscopy, and assessment of relative afferent pupillary defect.

MR image acquisition and analysis

Orbital MRI was conducted using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Signa HDxt; GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) equipped with a standard head coil (8-channel, HD Brain Coil, GE Healthcare). To mitigate the impact of motion artifacts, patients were given instructions to close their eyes and maintain immobility throughout the MRI scan. The resultant images encompass four distinct data sets, namely water-only, fat-only, Inphase, and Outphase images, which were acquired through the utilization of a post-processing algorithm.

The measurements were performed using the GE HDAW v. 4.4 workstation (GE Healthcare), which incorporates image analysis software. Two head and neck radiologists, each possessing more than 5 years of experience, analyzed all orbital data in a blinded manner, without knowledge of the participants’ clinical condition. Initially, the volume of orbital soft tissue was measured. Subsequently, the bony orbital (BO) volume was determined by outlining the boundaries of the bony orbit on the Inphase image, utilizing the technique described by Higashiyama et al. (14). Following this, the complete trajectory of the orbit was delineated on each axial Inphase image to establish the ROI encompassing the entire orbit. Subsequently, the three-dimensional orbit was isolated from the overall orbital structure, and the total volume of the orbit (referred to as Whole Orbit, WO) was computed automatically (14). The boundaries of the entire orbit on the Inphase image were then replicated on the fat-only image. Through the application of a threshold adjustment, solely the adipose tissue within the orbit was retained, enabling the quantification of orbital fat (OF) volume (15). Additional measurements were conducted to determine the volumes of the globe (GO), lacrimal gland, and optic nerve using the manual segmentation method. To obtain the volumes of these structures, manual outlining was performed on reconstructed axial and coronal water-only images. The volume of the extraocular muscles (EOM) was calculated by subtracting the volumes of the eyeball, lacrimal gland, optic nerve, and OF from the total orbital volume, as depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Flow chart of orbital segmentation based on Cube FSE-Flex image. (A) Obtain the WO by manual segmentation; (B) manual segmentation of the entire BO. (C-E) The volume of GO, LG and ON was obtained, respectively. (F) The volume of orbital fat was obtained by filtering the EOM, GO, ON and LG of the fat-only image using MDT method. BO, bony orbit; EOM, extraocular muscle; GO, globe; LG, lacrimal gland; MDT, multi-dimensional threshold; ON, optic nerve; WO, whole orbit.

The process of determining the WF in orbital soft tissue entailed the identification of the cross-sectional area exhibiting the largest dimensions for each EOM in the coronal position of the Water image. The contour of the EOM was delineated and documented as the ROI, subsequently transferred onto the corresponding Inphase image to record the signal intensity (SI). With meticulous attention to anatomical boundaries, ROIs were delineated within the four quadrants of OF at the coronal level of the Water and Inphase images, and the corresponding SI were documented. The WF of the EOMs and OF was determined and computed as the quotient of SIwater to SIInphase. The WF analysis utilized anatomically defined ROIs without SI thresholds, as the Cube FSE-Flex sequence’s inherent noise reduction and our manual ROI placement strategy (encompassing full anatomical structures while avoiding edge partial volume effects) ensured measurement reliability.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed utilizing IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and R software (version 4.2.3). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed to assess the consistency of measurements between the two neuroradiologists for the MRI parameters. To compare the DON and without-DON groups, chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were employed for categorical, normally distributed, and non-normally distributed continuous data, respectively. A logistic regression analysis was performed on variables with P values less than 0.10 in the intergroup analysis to ascertain the risk factors associated with DON, adjusting for age, sex, thyroid function parameters, and CAS. The diagnostic efficacy of imaging parameters in predicting DON was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Binary logistic regression was employed to jointly analyze the imaging parameters, and the resulting variable probabilities were fitted to the joint ROC curve. The significance level for all statistical tests was set at 0.05, and a two-sided P value less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.


Results

Clinical and demographic information

A total of sixty patients diagnosed with TAO were included in the study, with 27 patients in the DON group (16 males, 11 females; mean age 52.1±9.3 years) and 33 patients in the non-DON group (15 males, 18 females; mean age 49.5±7.6 years). A total of 116 orbits were analyzed, with 53 orbits exhibiting DON and 63 orbits without DON. The baseline characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, thyroid function status, or duration of disease (all P>0.05).

Table 1

The detailed demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with TAO with and without DON

Variable DON (n=27) Non-DON (n=33) P
Age (years) 52.1±9.3 49.5±7.6 0.096
Male/female 16/11 15/18 0.287
Duration (months)
   GD 6 [7] 14 [21] 0.004
   TAO 5 [4] 6 [9] 0.860
   DON 2 [2]
TSH (mIU/L) 0.42 (0.005–30.49) 0.838 (0.0025–38.491) 0.666
FT3 (pmol/L) 2.93 (2.23–6.20) 3.34 (2.29–5.59) 0.652
FT4 (pmol/L) 1.946 (0.64–27.12) 11.05 (0.74–25.50) 0.849
TRAb (IU/L) 13.20 (0.99–35.06) 5.29 (0.30–40.00) 0.664
CAS 4 (1–6) 4 (1–7) 0.898
VA 0.5 (0.15–1.2) 1.0 (0.25–1.2) 0.000
Exophthalmos (mm) 20 (14–24) 19.5 (14–27) 0.174
IOP (mmHg) 18.9±4.1 19.0±4.9 0.943

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, numbers, median [interquartile range], or median (range). CAS, clinical activity scores (0–7); DON, dysthyroid optic neuropathy; FT3, free triiodothyronine; FT4, free thyroxine; GD, Graves’ disease; IOP, intraocular pressure; TAO, thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy; TRAb, thyrotropin receptor antibody; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; VA, visual acuity.

Group differences in orbit soft tissue parameters

Compared to the group without DON, patients with DON demonstrated significantly higher WO volume (WOV) (42.7±4.6 vs. 40.6±3.9 cm3, P=0.010), EOM volume (EOMV) (14.6±3.1 vs. 11.5±2.2 cm3, P<0.001), EOM water fraction (EOM-WF) (85.7%±5.0% vs. 80.6%±6.8%, P<0.001), and OF water fraction (OF-WF) (25.0%±4.8% vs. 20.9%±3.6%, P<0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of BO, GO, optic nerve (ON), or OF volume (all P>0.05) (Table 2, Figure 2A,2B).

Table 2

Comparison of quantitative MRI parameters of patients with TAO with and without DON

Parameters DON Non-DON P
Volume (cm3)
   WO 42.7 (4.6) 40.6 (3.9) 0.010*
   BO 29.6 (3.7) 30.3 (3.7) 0.174
   EOM 14.6 (3.1) 11.5 (2.2) <0.001*
   OF 20.1 (3.4) 20.9 (3.0) 0.157
   GO 6.8 (0.6) 6.8 (0.5) 0.616
   ON 0.53 (0.12) 0.54 (0.11) 0.921
Water fraction (%)
   EOM 85.7 (5.0) 80.6 (6.8) <0.001*
   OF 25.0 (4.8) 20.9 (3.6) <0.001*

Data are presented as mean (standard deviation). *, statistically significant. BO, bony orbital; DON, dysthyroid optic neuropathy; EOM, extraocular muscle; GO, globe; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OF, orbital fat; ON, optic nerve; TAO, thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy; WO, whole orbit.

Figure 2 Quantitative MRI parameters for distinguishing DON in patients with TAO. Violin plots comparing the distribution of orbital soft tissue volumes (A) and water fractions (B) between patients with DON and those with TAO without DON. ROC curves illustrating the diagnostic performance of EOMV and OF-WF in distinguishing patients with DON from those without (C). ns, P>0.05; *, P<0.05; ****, P<0.0001. BO, bony orbit; DON, dysthyroid optic neuropathy; EOM-WF, water fraction of extraocular muscles; EOMV, extraocular muscle volume; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OF-WF, water fraction of orbital fat; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; TAO, thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy; WO, whole orbit.

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative MRI parameters

Multifactorial logistic analysis showed that EOMV and OF-WF were independent predictive parameters of DON (P<0.001, P=0.002, respectively). Increased EOMV [odds ratio (OR): 1.555; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.250, 1.934], elevated OF-WF (OR: 1.190; 95% CI: 1.064, 1.332) were associated with greater probability of DON (Table 3). The ROC analysis revealed that EOMV exhibited the highest level of diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing patients with DON from those without DON [area under the curve (AUC) =0.804; 95% CI: 0.727, 0.881]. Additionally, OF-WF demonstrated commendable diagnostic performance (AUC =0.776; 95% CI: 0.691, 0.860). Notably, a logistic regression model that integrated EOMV and OF-WF yielded enhanced diagnostic accuracy (AUC =0.843, 95% CI: 0.775, 0.912) (Table 4, Figure 2C).

Table 3

Association between quantitative MRI parameters and DON

Parameter Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
WOV 1.126 1.025, 1.236 0.013
EOMV 1.669 1.352, 2.061 <0.001 1.555 1.250, 1.934 <0.001
EOM-WF 1.157 1.075, 1.244 <0.001
OF-WF 1.256 1.131, 1.395 <0.001 1.190 1.064, 1.332 0.002

CI, confidence interval; DON, dysthyroid optic neuropathy; EOM-WF, water fraction of extraocular muscles; EOMV, extraocular muscle volume; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OF-WF, water fraction of orbital fat; OR, odds ratio; WOV, whole orbit volume.

Table 4

Comparison of diagnostic performance between the model and the single parameter

Parameter AUC (95% CI) Cutoff Sen Spe Acc PPV NPV
EOMV 0.804 (0.727, 0.881) 11.65 0.906 0.587 0.733 0.649 0.881
OF-WF 0.776 (0.691, 0.860) 21.25 0.755 0.730 0.741 0.702 0.780
Model 0.843 (0.775, 0.912) 0.47 0.698 0.810 0.759 0.755 0.761

Acc, accuracy; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; EOMV, extraocular muscle volume; NPV, negative predictive value; OF-WF, water fraction of orbital fat; PPV, positive predictive value; Sen, sensitivity; Spe, specificity.

Correlation of quantitative MRI parameters and clinical variables

Significant positive correlations were observed between EOMV and CAS (r=0.333, P=0.015), as well as between OF-WF and CAS (r=0.308, P=0.025) (Figure 3).

Figure 3 The correlation analysis of MRI parameters and clinical variables. CAS, clinical activity scores; EOM-WF, water fraction of extraocular muscles; EOMV, extraocular muscle volume; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OF-WF, water fraction of orbital fat; VA, visual acuity.

Discussion

In this study, 3D Cube FSE-Flex MRI sequences were utilized to evaluate the changes in orbital soft tissue volume and aqueous fraction in patients with DON. The results showed that the WO, EOMV, EOM-WF, and OF-WF were significantly higher in patients with DON compared with those with TAO alone. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis further confirmed that EOMV and OF-WF were independent risk factors for optic neuropathy.

The increased EOMV observed in DON patients likely reflects inflammatory edema, a finding consistent with previous studies (16-18). The positive correlation between EOMV and CAS supports the hypothesis that muscle swelling plays a central role in the pathophysiology of DON. This swelling may contribute to increased orbital pressure, which can compromise optic nerve function through direct compression or by impairing vascular supply (4,19). The elevated EOM-WF further corroborates the presence of edema, suggesting that the degree of water accumulation within the muscles could serve as a marker of disease activity and severity.

Similarly, the elevated OF-WF in DON patients suggests that OF tissue is also involved in the inflammatory process. Adipose tissue is known to be highly susceptible to inflammatory stimuli, which can lead to edema and increased water content (20,21). The edema of the EOMs and fat tissue may exacerbate the compression of the optic nerve at the orbital apex, thereby increasing the risk of DON. The significant correlation between OF-WF and CAS underscores the potential role of OF in the disease process and highlights the importance of comprehensive orbital assessment in patients with TAO.

The diagnostic efficacy of EOMV and OF-WF as independent predictors of DON, as demonstrated by ROC analysis, underscores their potential as biomarkers for early detection and risk stratification. The combination of these two parameters further enhances diagnostic performance, suggesting that they provide complementary information about different aspects of orbital pathology. This finding is of particular clinical significance, as early identification of high-risk patients could facilitate timely intervention and potentially prevent the progression of DON (22).

Recent advances have identified multiple potential MRI biomarkers for DON. Apical crowding indices demonstrate 64.6% sensitivity in multi-ethnic cohorts, while quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurements show superior diagnostic performance (AUC =0.844) (23). Our focus on volumetric and WF analysis complements these approaches by: (I) providing quantitative edema measurement through Dixon-based water-fat separation, and (II) enabling 3D assessment of structural remodeling beyond single-slice apical measurements. While we did not acquire diffusion-weighted imaging sequences for ADC analysis due to protocol standardization priorities, future studies combining volumetric, diffusion, and apical crowding parameters could yield a comprehensive biomarker panel.

Despite the promising results, this study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the retrospective design may introduce selection bias. Second, the relatively small sample size, while sufficient for primary analyses, warrants validation in larger cohorts. Third, the cross-sectional nature precludes causal inferences, necessitating longitudinal studies to evaluate these parameters as predictive biomarkers. Fourth, the lack of ethnic diversity (predominantly Han Chinese) may limit generalizability to other populations. Fifth, the semi-automated segmentation method, while effective, required substantial time investment, highlighting the need for more efficient automated techniques. Finally, incomplete smoking status documentation prevented its inclusion in multivariate analyses.


Conclusions

In conclusion, this study highlights the role of orbital soft tissues in the pathogenesis of DON, with increased EOMV and OF-WF showing strong associations with DON and reflecting the characteristic pathological changes of optic nerve compression. These quantitative MRI parameters demonstrate potential as investigational biomarkers for DON detection that warrant validation in prospective studies before clinical application. Future research should focus on validating these findings in larger, prospective cohorts and exploring the underlying mechanisms linking orbital tissue changes to optic neuropathy. Further research should explore optimal imaging protocols to maximize the reproducibility of these quantitative MRI measurements.


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-2025-935/rc

Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-2025-935/dss

Funding: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82471967).

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-2025-935/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital (No. ChiECRCT-20170087), and informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Khong JJ, Finch S, De Silva C, Rylander S, Craig JE, Selva D, Ebeling PR. Risk Factors for Graves' Orbitopathy; the Australian Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy Research (ATOR) Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:2711-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Yu CY, Ford RL, Wester ST, Shriver EM. Update on thyroid eye disease: Regional variations in prevalence, diagnosis, and management. Indian J Ophthalmol 2022;70:2335-45. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Blandford AD, Zhang D, Chundury RV, Perry JD. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy: update on pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2017;12:111-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Thyparampil P, Yen MT. Compressive Optic Neuropathy in Thyroid Eye Disease. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2016;56:51-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Johnson BT, Jameyfield E, Aakalu VK. Optic neuropathy and diplopia from thyroid eye disease: update on pathophysiology and treatment. Curr Opin Neurol 2021;34:116-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Ge Q, Zhang X, Wang L, Fan Y, Huang Q, Yao N, Long J, Liu C. Quantitative evaluation of activity of thyroid-associated Ophthalmopathy using short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence. BMC Endocr Disord 2021;21:226. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Hu H, Xu XQ, Wu FY, Chen HH, Su GY, Shen J, Hong XN, Shi HB. Diagnosis and stage of Graves' ophthalmopathy: Efficacy of quantitative measurements of the lacrimal gland based on 3-T magnetic resonance imaging. Exp Ther Med 2016;12:725-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Garau LM, Guerrieri D, De Cristofaro F, Bruscolini A, Panzironi G. Extraocular muscle sampled volume in Graves' orbitopathy using 3-T fast spin-echo MRI with iterative decomposition of water and fat sequences. Acta Radiol Open 2018;7:2058460118780892. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Tang X, Liu H, Chen L, Wang Q, Luo B, Xiang N, He Y, Zhu W, Zhang J. Semi-automatic volume measurement for orbital fat and total extraocular muscles based on Cube FSE-flex sequence in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Clin Radiol 2018;73:759.e11-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Chen Y, Zhai L, Liang W, Yin Y, Zhao Y, Yuan G, Luo B, Shao H, Baoyi W, Wang Q, Zhang J. Quantitative Analysis of Orbital Soft Tissues Using Three-Dimensional Fast Spin Echo With 2-Point Dixon-Based Fat Suppression Sequence: Its Association With Methylprednisolone Pulse Therapy Treatment Efficacy in Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2025;62:389-400. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Dolman PJ. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy: evaluation and management. J Endocrinol Invest 2021;44:421-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Gonçalves AC, Gebrim EM, Monteiro ML. Imaging studies for diagnosing Graves' orbitopathy and dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2012;67:1327-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Bartley GB, Gorman CA. Diagnostic criteria for Graves' ophthalmopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;119:792-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Higashiyama T, Nishida Y, Ohji M. Changes of orbital tissue volumes and proptosis in patients with thyroid extraocular muscle swelling after methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2015;59:430-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Varga-Szemes A, Muscogiuri G, Schoepf UJ, Wichmann JL, Suranyi P, De Cecco CN, Cannaò PM, Renker M, Mangold S, Fox MA, Ruzsics B. Clinical feasibility of a myocardial signal intensity threshold-based semi-automated cardiac magnetic resonance segmentation method. Eur Radiol 2016;26:1503-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Song C, Luo Y, Huang W, Duan Y, Deng X, Chen H, Yu G, Huang K, Xu S, Lin X, Wang Y, Shen J. Extraocular muscle volume index at the orbital apex with optic neuritis: a combined parameter for diagnosis of dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Eur Radiol 2023;33:9203-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Berger M, Matlach J, Pitz S, Berres M, Axmacher F, Kahaly GJ, Brockmann MA, Müller-Eschner M. Imaging of the medial rectus muscle predicts the development of optic neuropathy in thyroid eye disease. Sci Rep 2022;12:6259. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Tanenbaum RE, Lobo R, Kahana A, Wester ST. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of orbital disease. Can J Ophthalmol 2022;57:217-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Jeeva-Patel T, Emami S, Margolin E. Central Retinal Vein Occlusion and Compressive Optic Neuropathy Secondary to Thyroid Eye Disease. Can J Neurol Sci 2022;49:302-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Kawai T, Autieri MV, Scalia R. Adipose tissue inflammation and metabolic dysfunction in obesity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2021;320:C375-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Chait A, den Hartigh LJ. Adipose Tissue Distribution, Inflammation and Its Metabolic Consequences, Including Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 2020;7:22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Pelewicz-Sowa M, Miśkiewicz P. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy: emerging treatment strategies. J Endocrinol Invest 2023;46:1305-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Moledina M, Lee V, Bhatia K, Madani G, Feeney C, George N, Houbby N, Metcalf D, Man N, Jain R, Aziz A, Lingam RK. Radiological Activity Score (RAS)-MRI Characteristics in Dysthyroid Optic Neuropathy in a Multi-Ethnic Thyroid Eye Disease Population. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2025;103:385-95. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Liang W, Ma Y, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Yin Y, Zhai L, Luo B, Yuan G, Wang Q, Zhang J. Quantitative analysis of orbital soft tissue for the detection of dysthyroid optic neuropathy in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, based on three-dimensional cube fast spin-echo Flex. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2025;15(12):12535-12544. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-935

Download Citation